Re: [Development] moc output from non-local tool build

2021-09-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 14 September 2021 00:46:10 PDT Joerg Bornemann wrote: > Not sure what you're getting at here. Ninja multi-config and > QT_HOST_PATH are orthogonal features. Have these implementation issues > been reported? Yes. https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-95803 https://bugreports.qt.io/brows

Re: [Development] moc output from non-local tool build

2021-09-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 14 September 2021 09:03:59 PDT Joerg Bornemann wrote: > Unless QT_BUILD_TOOLS_WHEN_CROSSCOMPILING is ON which is used in yocto > context. I don't see why Yocto Project recipes need to be special. My problem as a QtCore developer is that almost anything I do will cause the Bootstrap l

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:40:37AM +0300, Иван Комиссаров wrote: 15 сент. 2021 г., в 14:03, Oswald Buddenhagen написал(а): for example, he plainly admits that his documentation doesn't match the code. That’s not true. for it not being true you're making a _remarkable_ effort to establish t

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Иван Комиссаров
> 15 сент. 2021 г., в 14:03, Oswald Buddenhagen > написал(а): > > in a nutshell, though, i think ivan's initial message is revealing > enough - for example, he plainly admits that his documentation doesn't > match the code. that's an automatic -1, and a yellow card for attitude. That’s not tr

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Иван Комиссаров
OK, it will be fair to list the problems/inconveniences we have right now (or, in other way, the advantages of GitHib) - It is hard for the newcomers to get familiar with gerrit - some people submitted raw patches in JIRA claiming they don’t have time to learn Gerrit while knowing the pull-requ

Re: [Development] moc output from non-local tool build

2021-09-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday, 15 September 2021 02:39:18 PDT Edward Welbourne wrote: > As a third alternative, we could introduce an environment variable that > can be over-ridden by command-line options; then in the early stages the > build system uses the environment variable (for backwards compatibility) > unti

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 01:37:38PM +0200, Christian Kandeler wrote: I think our definition of "guidance" differs. For me, it does not involve going into infinite loops of obsessively arguing about points that only I care about. I do believe, however, that I am reasonably capable of telling a good

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Tuukka Turunen
Hi, Let’s look into what kind of additional systems we could arrange that helps development of Qbs. Just now everyone is busy getting Qt 6.2 and QDS 2.2 successfully released, but we should be able to look into this latest in the beginning of October. Yours, Tuukka From: Dev

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Christian Kandeler
On 9/15/21 1:03 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: in this case, you personally instructed the maintainer to do only minimal maintenance work (which he does an excellent job at). he has repeatedly made clear that he has exactly *zero* interest in the strategic direction of qbs, and is letting "the com

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 02:33:04PM +, Lars Knoll wrote: Ossi, I (and probably others on this mailing list) would also like to hear your view on this. my view is that ivan is being unreasonable (surprise surprise). most of the recent discussion happened on discord (https://discord.com/chann

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi Lars, Tuukka, > I also would very much like you to stay here. Also, you need to write some blog post about that Qbs right now is not dropped, that the community starts working on that. ;) Because the previous "deprecation" news had a very bad effect on Qbs popularity. You are almost kill

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi Lars, Tuukka, > I also would very much like you to stay here. AFAIK, a main issue here not about of maintenance behaviour. A main issue in the access right on the Qbs project. F.e. right now it is hard to maintenance the CI integration with the GitHub, to generate the pre-compiled releases

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Lars Knoll
Hi Ivan, I also would very much like you to stay here. QBS is great project and something that came out of the Qt work and still has very strong ties to it. I am fully with Tuukka that what we want is to make it a good experience and easy for people to work here in the project. Blocking other p

Re: [Development] Qbs development

2021-09-15 Thread Tuukka Turunen
Hi, I would not like Qbs development to move away from the Qt project. It is very unfortunate that you have had bad experience and misbehavior from one approver. We want to constantly improve the experience of working within the Qt project and naturally this kind of incidents are not doing that

[Development] [Announce] Qt Creator 5.0.1 released

2021-09-15 Thread List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 5.0.1 ! https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-creator-5.0.1-released -- Eike Ziller Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company GmbH Erich-Thilo-Straße 10 D-12489 Berlin eike.zil...@qt.io http://qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintun