Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5

2020-11-23 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 18/11/2020 07.34, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Possibly also: assistant6 for reading Qt 6 help files when not using Qt Creator designer6 for those not using Qt Creator and needing to use Qt 6 plugins Offtopic, but I wonder how much those standalone apps are still being

Re: [Development] QVariant comparison in Qt6 (URGENT)

2020-11-23 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
On 23/11/2020 11:29, Lars Knoll wrote: I've quickly implemented 3) and pushed it here. It's only missing docs. https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/322900 (includes the rationale of why optional is the wrong datatype) I like this approach. Thanks, patch is ready for review now.

Re: [Development] QVariant::operator< deprecation fallout

2020-11-23 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
Hi, On 23/11/2020 08:48, Fabian Kosmale wrote: I think we should at least_somehow_ deprecate operator<; but I'm not sure if it should be a special deprecation macro, or a special one. I'm guessing you meant generic / special. I'm more keen on keeping everything deprecated, but with a special

Re: [Development] QVariant comparison in Qt6 (URGENT)

2020-11-23 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 23 Nov 2020, at 09:57, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development > wrote: > > Hi, > > On 22/09/2020 16:17, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> And especially if there's no impact to how the user uses the API. >>> 1) >>> std::optional compare(); >>> >>> 2) >>> enum class Ordering { Less = -1, Equal = 0, Gre

Re: [Development] QVariant comparison in Qt6 (URGENT)

2020-11-23 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
Hi, On 22/09/2020 16:17, Thiago Macieira wrote: And especially if there's no impact to how the user uses the API. 1) std::optional compare(); 2) enum class Ordering { Less = -1, Equal = 0, Greater = 1, Unordered = 0xff }; Ordering compare(); 3) Implement a Qt replacement for std::partial_o

Re: [Development] Handling of Needs More Info issues in Jira

2020-11-23 Thread Alex Blasche
As some of you might have noticed on Saturday night, I enabled automatic closure of "Need more Info" issues. Unfortunately I screwed the process up with a slightly wrong JQL querry when sedding the sets. This caused about 750 issues to be transitioned out of NMI. Essentially I failed to set the