On Saturday, 19 September 2020 11:41:08 PDT Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 21:58, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> > Anyway, the int suffices because we only need four values:
> > equal/equivalent,>
> > less than, greater than, unordered. We can even adopt the same values:
> > //
On Saturday, 19 September 2020 11:48:11 PDT Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> Our customers report otherwise. Upgrading Qt and using it on an older
> compiler seems doable
> by a whole lotta customers. Upgrading Qt and upgrading toolchains
> seems much less doable,
> so that would be a bold expectation. T
On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 06:28, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> But for other things, I'm not shy about it. People can't complain that they
> can't use features that didn't exist when they wrote their application. If
> they want to use new features, it stands to reason they've just upgraded Qt.
> If they
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 21:58, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Anyway, the int suffices because we only need four values: equal/equivalent,
> less than, greater than, unordered. We can even adopt the same values:
> // less=0xff, equiv=0x00, greater=0x01, unordered=0x02
> or we can use -127 for unorder
