On Monday, 10 August 2020 22:09:10 PDT Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> This is something what I have been wondering a while: what is correct set of
> changes to be listed in changes file? Is it all changes from previous
> release in that same series (e.g all changes from 5.15.0 -> 5.15.1 ) or
> changes fro
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Thiago Macieira
> Sent: maanantai 10. elokuuta 2020 20.33
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] ChangeLog script will need adaptation to cherry-pick
> model
>
> I've just noticed this and it'll be relevant for the
On 10.08.20 11:29, Alexandru Croitor wrote:
On 9. Aug 2020, at 19:57, Arno Rehn wrote:
I'm trying to port over qtwebchannel from qmake to CMake, so we can
hopefully include it in Qt 6.1 again. The problem is that I can't get
the unit tests going with the old qmake system against current qt6 dev.
I've just noticed this and it'll be relevant for the 6.0 release: the
ChangeLog script currently excludes the previous releases' commits simply
because they aren't produced in the git log / rev-list output. Because we
switched to cherry-pick model, the commits are now different and will not be
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this proposal and I'm skeptical that it
can be done at all.
I think there are two occasions where evaluation must be instant. The first is
if your write property handler has any emits in it, and the second is if there
are any other properties that depend
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Arno Rehn
> Sent: Sunday, 9 August 2020 7:58 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] qmake: qmltest missing in Qt6
>
> Hey everybody,
>
> I'm trying to port over qtwebchannel from qmake to CMake, so we can
> hop
> On 9. Aug 2020, at 19:57, Arno Rehn wrote:
>
> Hey everybody,
Hi,
>
> I'm trying to port over qtwebchannel from qmake to CMake, so we can
> hopefully include it in Qt 6.1 again. The problem is that I can't get
> the unit tests going with the old qmake system against current qt6 dev. I'd
>
