Re: [Development] GitHub Pull requests

2020-03-14 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
15.03.2020, 05:30, "Thiago Macieira" : > On Saturday, 14 March 2020 09:11:39 EST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  My feeling about the last item is quite opposite: >>  * UI cuts long lines, when I wanted to check if specific compiler flag is >>  actually in use, and of course it was beyond "..." >>

Re: [Development] GitHub Pull requests

2020-03-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 13 March 2020 04:19:22 EST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 13.03.2020, 08:55, "Thiago Macieira" : > > For a complex set of needs like Qt's, you'l still need a dedicated person > > or multiple people. And this isn't free either, despite there being a lot > > of free CIs for open source projec

Re: [Development] GitHub Pull requests

2020-03-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 13 March 2020 04:48:21 EST Florian Bruhin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:51:31PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > I also need two CIs so I can test on just three OSes. > > Can you elaborate on that? I assume those are Linux, macOS and Windows? Correct. > Pretty much all big CI p

Re: [Development] GitHub Pull requests

2020-03-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Saturday, 14 March 2020 09:11:39 EST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > My feeling about the last item is quite opposite: > * UI cuts long lines, when I wanted to check if specific compiler flag is > actually in use, and of course it was beyond "..." > * UI doesn't allow using built-in search of browse

Re: [Development] Thank you for qScopeGuard

2020-03-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 13 March 2020 10:55:29 EST Konstantin Ritt wrote: > Ah I see Q_DISABLE_COPY(QScopeGuard), so perhaps that's the docu issue. It's not QScopeGuard that is being copied/moved, but the callable. You can pass a functor there (like std::function), which needs to be copied into the QScopeGua

Re: [Development] Debian packaging from Git snapshots (qtsystems, qtfeedback, qtpim)

2020-03-14 Thread Mike Gabriel via Development
Hi Lorn, On Sa 14 Mär 2020 20:45:32 CET, Lorn Potter wrote: Hi, On 13/3/20 10:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote:     * qtsystems     * qtfeedback     * qtpim I am about to upload the first (qtsystems) to Debian and before doing that, I'd like to know, if these projects can be considered API/ABI stab

Re: [Development] Debian packaging from Git snapshots (qtsystems, qtfeedback, qtpim)

2020-03-14 Thread Mike Gabriel via Development
Hi Chris, thanks for following up on my questions. On Fr 13 Mär 2020 01:32:24 CET, Chris Adams wrote: Hi Mike, I don't know much / anything about QtSystems, Ok... perhaps Lorn has more Ok, I'll try to ping him directly via mail. Thanks for the pointer. information about that. I am c

Re: [Development] Debian packaging from Git snapshots (qtsystems, qtfeedback, qtpim)

2020-03-14 Thread Lorn Potter
Hi, On 13/3/20 10:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote:     * qtsystems     * qtfeedback     * qtpim I am about to upload the first (qtsystems) to Debian and before doing that, I'd like to know, if these projects can be considered API/ABI stable or heavy changes are to be expected on these projects.

Re: [Development] GitHub Pull requests

2020-03-14 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
12.03.2020, 23:31, "Robert Löhning" : > Hi, > > after having worked in a project in GitHub for a couple of months now > and seeing their CI from the user perspective, this sounds feasible to me. > ... > - the progress and results are comprehensible, you can look at the CI > run just like you look