On Friday, 28 February 2020 10:42:54 PST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 February 2020 11:50:02 PST Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Declarative in 5.15 (5.14?) has public API taking a std::function and that
> > appears to be okay so far :)
>
> Good to know. I see it in two public h
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 22:35, Lars Knoll wrote:
> >> You'd see instead:
> >>this->emptied().emit(...);
> >>connect(foo, foo->emptied(), ...);
> > I like this, then we could finally (and without hacks) have protected and
> > private signals like in Qt 4.
> > Would also solve the need for q
Hi,
We have problems with our infra and for that reason our CI is currently down.
Unfortunately no estimation yet when we have system up and running again.
Ystävällisin terveisin / Kind regards,
Heikki Halmet
Software Engineer | CI Lead
Release and Test Automation | CI Team
The Qt Company | Fi
On Friday, 28 February 2020 16:28:34 CET Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 27/02/2020 17.03, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > On Thursday, 27 February 2020 21:51:18 CET Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> >> On 26/02/2020 07.42, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> >>> As others have argued, a signal is not special, in the sen