We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 4.11 RC!
https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-creator-4.11-rc-released
--
Eike Ziller
Principal Software Engineer
The Qt Company GmbH
Erich-Thilo-Straße 10
D-12489 Berlin
eike.zil...@qt.io
http://qt.io
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi,
Juha Varelius, Mika Harj
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 12:21, Sérgio Martins wrote:
>
> On 2019-11-29 08:15, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:52, Sérgio Martins via Development
> > wrote:
>
> (...)
> >> I suggest we rename such signals, as KDE is already doing for KF6
> >> (maybe
> >> leave the old signatu
On 2019-11-29 08:15, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:52, Sérgio Martins via Development
wrote:
(...)
I suggest we rename such signals, as KDE is already doing for KF6
(maybe
leave the old signatures there, to reduce Qt6 SIC)
There's also a new clazy check 'overloaded-signa
Hi,
I would like to remove some of the ancient submodules from qt5.git. They never
were part of the Qt 5 offering anyway and mostly we were not sure whether we
reactivate them. Considering that we never had a use through Qt 5's life time,
I think it's time to remove them from the default setup.
Congratulations to Cristian. Approver rights have been set.
--
Alex
From: Development on behalf of Alessandro
Portale
Sent: Friday, 8 November 2019 21:35
To: Qt Development
Subject: [Development] Nominating Cristian Adam as approver
Hi,
I like to prop
Hi,
On 29-11-19 09:15, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:52, Sérgio Martins via Development
wrote:
Hi,
The Qt5 PMF connect syntax is wonderful and very elegant compared to Qt
4.
Unless, ofc, you have overloaded signals, which makes it painful to
write and read. Not even qOve
Yeah, I understand the reasoning, because of lack of ABI compat with minor
updates/patches, etc.
However, our proprietary GUI needs it. I'll work on recompiling that module
with private headers and deploy the deb within our own internal apt-feed.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:04 AM Pier Luigi Fiorini
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 17:52, Sérgio Martins via Development
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> The Qt5 PMF connect syntax is wonderful and very elegant compared to Qt
> 4.
> Unless, ofc, you have overloaded signals, which makes it painful to
> write and read. Not even qOverload makes it look much better.
>
>
>
Il giorno ven 29 nov 2019 alle ore 08:44 Paul Knopf
ha scritto:
> I'm working on getting Debian 10 working for my Linux appliance/device and
> our GUI uses Qt.
>
> Specifically, it uses "CONFIG+=multimedia-private".
>
> There seems to be a bunch of private Qt headers in the official repos, but
>
