Hi,
CI is working again. We had some issues with database, but those are fixed now.
Thanks for your patience!
Br
Heikki
From: Heikki Halmet
Sent: tiistai 15. lokakuuta 2019 17.02
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: CI problem
Hi,
We have problems in CI. Integrations don't get VM's for so
Hi,
We have problems in CI. Integrations don't get VM's for some reason. Hopefully
we'll solve this out soon as possible.
Ystävällisin terveisin / Kind regards,
Heikki Halmet
Software Engineer | CI Lead
Release and Test Automation | CI Team
The Qt Company | Finland | Oulu
___
Kari Oikarinen (Friday, October 11, 2019 3:04 PM) wrote:
>>> I want to propose eliminating soft branching phase and instead use
>>> the creation of the branch as a cut-off for feature freeze (or bug
>>> fixes for a patch release). Frederik already alluded that there has
>>> been some discussion abo
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 08:38:30AM +, Liang Qi wrote:
2. patch releases, 1st one and others, for the first one, like 5.14.0
perhaps similar story like above. Anyway, for the patch releases, if
the changes missed this release, but still could happen in next. So I
think it’s better to remove
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 01:40:48PM +, Kari Oikarinen wrote:
On 12.10.2019 14.14, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:04:20PM +, Kari Oikarinen wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, the major motivation for providing this week
>> of
>> soft branching is to allow people to fi
We are using soft branching phase for two categories:
1. feature frozen or minor branch, like dev to 5.14, many new changes are
targeting 5.14 release, but happened in dev branch, and not easy to be
integrated or verified soon. the one week soft branching phase could help bit
here.
2. patch re
On 15.10.2019 11.19, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:16:33AM +, Kari Oikarinen wrote:
>> After thinking about it again, I agree with you that it's irrelevant.
>> There could be a category of changes that would need to wait and I was
>> describing it.
>>
>> But in fact t
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:16:33AM +, Kari Oikarinen wrote:
After thinking about it again, I agree with you that it's irrelevant.
There could be a category of changes that would need to wait and I was
describing it.
But in fact there isn't, since the branching and the associated cut-off
has
On 17th October the server will go offline for security updates. The downtime
is estimated to last one hour and starts at 7:30am CEST.
--
Alex
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
