On Wednesday, 14 August 2019 07:09:33 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 16:04:38 PDT Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > That is exactly the same Chromium does. Except we already put the work
> > into
> > backporting the fixes.
>
> ALL of them? How quickly?
>
> Please make sur
On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 16:04:38 PDT Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> That is exactly the same Chromium does. Except we already put the work into
> backporting the fixes.
ALL of them? How quickly?
Please make sure that either you're releasing within two weeks of *every* CVE
or that I can use an
On Wednesday, 14 August 2019 00:59:39 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 13:03:17 PDT Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
>
> wrote:
> > PDF libraries tend to be a common source of CVEs, so whichever library
> > is used it should be certainly easy to update without the need o
On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 13:03:17 PDT Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> PDF libraries tend to be a common source of CVEs, so whichever library
> is used it should be certainly easy to update without the need of a
> third party acting as a proxy.
That is also the biggest drawback with
On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 22:03:17 CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 09:39, Kai Köhne wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Qt PDF is so far a Qt labs module [1]. It allows Qt applications to
> > render/view PDF's in QWidget based applications [2], and is built o
Hi!
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 09:39, Kai Köhne wrote:
[snip]
>
> Qt PDF is so far a Qt labs module [1]. It allows Qt applications to
> render/view PDF's in QWidget based applications [2], and is built on top of
> PDFium. However, development has been stagnant, also because it is built on
> top of
On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 09:43:35 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
> > Because I don't want to see us undermine a nice open source project that
> > is
> > struggling to find contributors by promoting a worse alternative just
> > because it can be sold.
>
> Poppler is not usable by any of Qt’s commercial cu
On 13 Aug 2019, at 18:11, Thiago Macieira
mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com>> wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 02:20:04 PDT Shawn Rutledge wrote:
Why are you biased towards Poppler being better? It’s older, yes, and it
has had a Qt binding for a long time, so it has been easy to use in Qt
widget
On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 00:50:48 PDT Friedemann Kleint wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > VC++ 2019
>
>
> Just for the record, this compiler still has a number of optimizer bugs,
> see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-2875 .
Unfortunately, despite those, it's still the best available. MSVC 201
On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 02:20:04 PDT Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> Why are you biased towards Poppler being better? It’s older, yes, and it
> has had a Qt binding for a long time, so it has been easy to use in Qt
> widget-based projects for a long time already. (I have experience doing
> that; when
Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> But PDFium has a company behind it, and I have heard that if one pays for
> the commercial version, it has enough features to make a real PDF editing
> application. I haven’t tried that yet; but it may turn out later that
> this will give us access to a bigger feature set e
> On 13 Aug 2019, at 11:39, Tony Sarajärvi wrote:
>
> MacOS is another good example where we claim to support the latest 3
> available at the time of release. But in 4 years of an LTS release we
> actually don’t have a single one of those 3 left that were out when we
> released 5.x.0. Are we
> On 12 Aug 2019, at 22:17, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 12 August 2019 00:17:58 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
>> As mentioned in my blog, it would be good to move forward with the C++
>> version we use for Qt 6 and ideally move it to C++17.
>
> Someone with iOS knowledge please address the
Hi all!
We've been going back to defining what "supported platform" means many times.
This time however I want to loosen the reins a bit:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtdoc/+/269546
We stumble upon a problem where the distro itself isn't supported and / or its
repositories are in wors
> On 13 Aug 2019, at 02:06, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Monday, 12 August 2019 15:10:47 PDT Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> The existing implementation based on PDFium, on the other hand, provides us
>> with an alternative implementation, which application developers may prefer
>> for various reasons (
Hi,
> VC++ 2019
Just for the record, this compiler still has a number of optimizer bugs,
see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-2875 .
Regards, Friedemann
--
Friedemann Kleint
The Qt Company GmbH
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-
16 matches
Mail list logo
