Hi!
> For Qt XML Patterns, the situation is IMO a bit different. The module has
> some architectural problems
Do you think this is true for all parts of the component?
I am asking because I can not imagine using XML without a schema validator,
which is part
of Qt Xml Pattern. Do you consider it
On 2019-05-25 17:24, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
сб, 25 мая 2019 г., 12:30 Mutz, Marc via Development
Repeat after me: default ctors do _not_ establish a valid value.
Perhaps you mean "trivial type's default ctors do _not_ establish a
valid value"?
No, I actually meant default ctor. What should t
> There are more tweaks that would be nice to apply to the UI to make it
> better. Does the new version make this any easier? What's your advice for
> people who'd like to contribute UI tweaks? What's the best way to
> proceed? (in the sense of empowering potential contributors instead of
> asking
сб, 25 мая 2019 г., 12:30 Mutz, Marc via Development <
development@qt-project.org>:
> Further to the question about default ctors for such "obvious" stuff as
>
> On 2019-05-21 10:27, Mutz, Marc via Development wrote:
> > class QRect {
> >int x, y, w, h;
> > public:
> >QRect
Further to the question about default ctors for such "obvious" stuff as
On 2019-05-21 10:27, Mutz, Marc via Development wrote:
class QRect {
int x, y, w, h;
public:
QRect() = default;
};
QRect r; // partially-formed
r.x(); // compilers _already_ warn about thi
Hi,
Il 19/05/19 14:24, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development ha scritto:
Hence, I'll ask here: what should the status of a moved-from object be?
I'm not really interested in_how_ to achieve such status (although of
course it's very important, and should influence the decision); I'm
interested in wh
