> Does it mean that the binaries we distribute should work on that?
I have been maintaining XCB plugin and the bundled xkbcommon and xcb 3rd party
sources based on the assumption that an answer to this question is - yes.
From: Development on behalf of Tony
Sar
Hi all!
I'd like to open up a discussion about the platforms we "support". This is
like listening to a broken record, but once again it’s about adding or removing
platforms in the CI, what’s supported and what we do packages with. But, this
time I'm going to approach you a bit differently. Ins
Yeah, I'll update https://wiki.qt.io/Qt5Releasing to match the schedule
template we have already used with 5.12 and 5.13
br,
Jani
From: Andy Shaw
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 11:35 AM
To: Edward Welbourne; Jani Heikkinen
Cc: development@qt-project.org; rel
I think you have a typo there ( 17 weeks before 26.11.2019 would be 30.07.2019.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Development on behalf of Edward
Welbourne
Date: Thursday, 2 May 2019 at 10:27
To: Jani Heikkinen
Cc: "development@qt-project.org" ,
"releas...@qt-project.org"
Subject: Re:
Jani Heikkinen (2 May 2019 08:00)
> We are in final steps with Qt 5.13.0 release and so on it is time to start
> planning Qt 5.14.0 initial schedule.
>
> Qt 5.13 isn't indicating anything why we could cut the schedule so my
> proposal is based on Qt 5.12.0 and Qt 5.13.0 ones:
>
> - 19.08.2019: So
