On Friday, 19 April 2019 08:11:41 +08 Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez wrote:
> ```
> ./configure -prefix "/somePath/Qt512Static" -static -release -opensource
> -confirm-license -qt-zlib -qt-pcre -qt-libpng -qt-libjpeg -fontconfig
> -qt-xcb -opengl desktop -sql-sqlite -make libs -make tools -nomake exa
Alexander Nassian:
> There are many ways that are much better and do not have the problems
> static linking involves.
Many ways much better?
Static linking is the recommended approach on Linux. And the people from
the company uses static linking to build some Qt tools for linux (I have
already c
El jueves, 18 de abril de 2019 14:13:47 -03 Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)
escribió:
[snip]
> However, why are patch releases considered a new component instead of an
> update? Why do you need to "add a new component" from the installer to get
> 5.12.3 if you are on 5.12.2? If 5.12 were treated as a
On 4/18/19, 5:51 AM, "Development on behalf of André Pönitz"
wrote:
There is no latest *and* safest version of any non-trivial code base
that's under active feature development no matter what Google,
Microsoft, Apple, ("long time ago" Nokia) say.
...
When you mix featur
Does this affect shipping Qt apps in the store?
I'm not a Windows expert but as far as I remember only UWP apps are
supposed to go there, but I can be wrong.
Il giorno gio 18 apr 2019 alle ore 14:50 Oliver Wolff
ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> as you might have heard, we are currently in Qt 6's planning p
On Thursday, 18 April 2019 17:31:57 +08 Khuram Ali via Development wrote:
> I agree. Why not offer a patch for the bug fixes, instead of a new release
> which needs to be installed separately.
The patch is available for download from the Git repository. After you apply
it, re-run configure and ma
Hi,
as you might have heard, we are currently in Qt 6's planning phase and
thus checking things that have to be done to make Qt even better.
Of course we also want to use this opportuniy to drop support for
platforms that are no longer relevant in Qt's new environment.
One of these platforms is
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:24:24AM +0300, BogDan Vatra via Development
wrote:
> [...]
> As I commented in
> https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/04/11/updated-qt-installer-released/,
> as a Qt maintainer, I wonder quite often, if it's worth to spend
> time to fix bugs that will go in revision/micro
În ziua de joi, 18 aprilie 2019, la 13:54:15 EEST, André Pönitz a scris:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:24:24AM +0300, BogDan Vatra via Development
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Long time ago the Qt online SDK used to help the users to use the
> > latest and the safest Qt version all the time.
>
> On 18. Apr 2019, at 10:37, BogDan Vatra via Development
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As I said, they still have the possibility to install a specific Qt version
> and stick with it. The installer will not force them to use the latest
> version! If some companies prefer to use outdated software wh
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:24:24AM +0300, BogDan Vatra via Development
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Long time ago the Qt online SDK used to help the users to use the
> latest and the safest Qt version all the time.
There is no latest *and* safest version of any non-trivial code base
that's under active f
Hi,
Qt 5.9.8 is released today, see
https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/04/18/qt-5-9-8-released/
Big thanks to everyone involved!
br,
Jani Heikkinen
Release Manager
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo
I agree. Why not offer a patch for the bug fixes, instead of a new release
which needs to be installed separately.
Regards,
Khuram Ali
Sent from my iPhone
> On 18. Apr 2019, at 11:20, Bernhard Lindner
> wrote:
>
> Actually the Qt update behavior annoys my as well.
>
> I wish there would be
Actually the Qt update behavior annoys my as well.
I wish there would be two checkbox options in the maintenance tool:
"Install new bug fix versions automatically"
"Install new minor versions automatically"
This is reasonable, isn't it?
--
Best Regards
Bernhard Lindner
>
> As I said, t
Hi,
As I said, they still have the possibility to install a specific Qt version
and stick with it. The installer will not force them to use the latest
version! If some companies prefer to use outdated software which might have
security issues is their choice, what I'm asking is for an easy way
Hi,
Long time ago the Qt online SDK used to help the users to use the latest and
the safest Qt version all the time. Sadly that was changed, IMHO without too
much thinking, and now a lot of users (I'm one of them) are stucked with
outdated versions. A few days ago I installed 5.12.2 and today
16 matches
Mail list logo
