On Sunday, 14 April 2019 16:47:07 PDT Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez wrote:
> There is a Jira suggestion:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-72810
>
> Please give an upvote there it if you agree.
Better yet: instead of upvoting, omeone post the full command-line that
produces a working build.
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 4.9.0!
https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/04/15/qt-creator-4-9-0-released/
--
Eike Ziller
Principal Software Engineer
The Qt Company GmbH
Rudower Chaussee 13
D-12489 Berlin
eike.zil...@qt.io
http://qt.io
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi,
Juha Varelius, Mi
There are many ways that are much better and do not have the problems static
linking involves.
Beste Grüße / Best regards,
Alexander Nassian
> Am 15.04.2019 um 01:47 schrieb Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez
> :
>
> What do people think about providing official static packages?
>
> The reason is t
Il 15/04/19 01:47, Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez ha scritto:
There internet is full of people trying to build Qt statically, because
Qt Docs lacks information about building static packages and there are
not examples of commands to pass to configure.
For the record:
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/w
Hi Frank,
At first I targeted v0.3, but then I found a bug that did not allow me to
add InstanceDeclarations to the QObject tree (
https://github.com/open62541/open62541/issues/2564). They fixed the bug on
master.
So now I target current master, I will try to lock the C++ API when v0.4 is
officia
