Re: [Development] A deployment tool for Linux

2019-04-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mitch Curtis wrote: > (which it turns out you still need to bundle libs that are dynamically > linked like ICU) With a bit of effort, you can also force Qt to build against a static ICU. This is the hack (abusing the ICU bundled by Chromium bundled by QtWebEngine, which is part of the monolithic Q

Re: [Development] Adding more Datetime classes to Qt

2019-04-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday, 10 April 2019 03:36:47 PDT Mark De Wit wrote: > It might be good to highlight, for instance, that MSecsSinceEpoch is not > share-able between users in different timezones unless QDateTime is > instantiated with a timespec of Qt::UTC (which is not the default). Of course it is sharabl

Re: [Development] A deployment tool for Linux

2019-04-11 Thread Łukasz Korbel
Nice to know that someone prepared linuxdeployqt. Even if slow its probably better than no tool at all as it is now. Last time on my CI I had to use simple copy script with fixed list of libs based od readelf info. Works but I would rather preffer to avoid repeating this :) *Łukasz Korbel * Senior

Re: [Development] A deployment tool for Linux

2019-04-11 Thread Ashley Sibille
Someone please remove me from this list On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:44 AM Jason H wrote: > > 11.04.2019, 04:05, "Richard Weickelt" : > > > On 10.04.2019 23:21, Marco Bubke wrote: > > >> Sounds you want flatpak. ;-) > > > > > > All those run-time extracted application container formats might be >

Re: [Development] A deployment tool for Linux

2019-04-11 Thread Jason H
> 11.04.2019, 04:05, "Richard Weickelt" : > > On 10.04.2019 23:21, Marco Bubke wrote: > >>  Sounds you want flatpak. ;-) > > > > All those run-time extracted application container formats might be nice > > solutions for GUI applications which is apparently the main target of Qt. > > But my observat

Re: [Development] Gitlab at qt.io

2019-04-11 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
10.04.2019, 09:29, "Kari Oikarinen" : > On 9.4.2019 17.02, Richard Weickelt wrote: >>  Hi, >> >>  I would like to know more about https://git.qt.io >> >>  - What's the purpose and the future plan? > > It's an internal Gitlab instance for The Qt Company. It's mostly a place for > people to put sma

Re: [Development] A deployment tool for Linux

2019-04-11 Thread Mitch Curtis
I think it's better to have a tool that does *something* with a documented, limited scope than offer nothing at all. Then again, I know very little about shipping applications on Linux. I've either been building statically (which it turns out you still need to bundle libs that are dynamically l

Re: [Development] Qt wrapper for UPC UA Server stack (open62541)

2019-04-11 Thread Juan Gonzalez Burgos
Hi Maurice Yes of course I am aware of the Qt OpcUA module. I even saw presentations , read all their blog posts and went through their source code, all in the hope to find a server API. Sadly they mentioned somewhere that they did not plan a server API in the future, so here we are. Of course I