On Saturday, 23 February 2019 01:52:06 PST Richard Weickelt wrote:
> > But do note that our parallelism isn't that bad right now. There's a long
> > critical path before parallel things can currently be built, but once
> > QtQml is built, the number of jobs that can be launched in parallel is
> > v
Thanks for all the great work on Qt QML over the last years Simon!
And of course a +1 for Ulf.
Cheers,
Lars
> On 21 Feb 2019, at 16:57, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
>
> This is great news, I'm happy to see Ulf taking over while Simon will be able
> to give advice.
>
> +1 (in case that wasn't cle
Thanks!
Lars
> On 18 Feb 2019, at 09:03, Kari Oikarinen wrote:
>
> qt/qtbase now has a branch wip/qt6.
>
> On 15.2.2019 10.03, Lars Knoll wrote:
>> Let’s also conclude this thread. Majority consensus was that we need a
>> branch
>> and most votes went towards wip/qt6. So let’s use that for Q
> But do note that our parallelism isn't that bad right now. There's a long
> critical path before parallel things can currently be built, but once QtQml
> is
> built, the number of jobs that can be launched in parallel is very big. What
> doesn't need that build isn't very large.
Could you e
