Am 09.02.2019 um 07:34 schrieb Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development:
Hi,
Il 09/02/19 02:27, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
Commit 7847e6bc02552fa7fc7f518e5cb3336f667b5a6d in qtbase madee the
QT_DEPRECATED and QT_DEPRECATED_X warnings on by default in Qt
builds. That
means we started seeing lots of
Hi,
Il 09/02/19 02:27, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
Commit 7847e6bc02552fa7fc7f518e5cb3336f667b5a6d in qtbase madee the
QT_DEPRECATED and QT_DEPRECATED_X warnings on by default in Qt builds. That
means we started seeing lots of warnings that weren't there in 5.12.
Agree with the rest of the ema
Commit 7847e6bc02552fa7fc7f518e5cb3336f667b5a6d in qtbase madee the
QT_DEPRECATED and QT_DEPRECATED_X warnings on by default in Qt builds. That
means we started seeing lots of warnings that weren't there in 5.12.
ALL such warnings must be fixed by 5.13.0 release. Please treat them as P1 (or
P½
On 8 Feb 2019, at 10:43, Vitaly Fanaskov
mailto:vitaly.fanas...@qt.io>> wrote:
On 2/7/19 5:03 PM, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
Hi all,
TL;DR; we are considering moving file system operations from QFile into a
seperate class (or set of classes) for a more consistent and flexible way of
moving, co
+2
On February 8, 2019 11:12:25 Christian Kandeler
wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:03:30 +
> Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
>
>> Thoughts, ideas, and pointers to other frameworks that you believe provide a
>> good API are welcome here in this email thread before moving to a dedicated
>> JIRA ti
> On 8 Feb 2019, at 11:10, Christian Kandeler wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:03:30 +
> Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
>
>> Thoughts, ideas, and pointers to other frameworks that you believe provide a
>> good API are welcome here in this email thread before moving to a dedicated
>> JIRA tick
+1 when I first started, that threw me off as well.
Daniel
From: Christian Kandeler
To: "development@qt-project.org"
Sent: 2/8/2019 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Development] New API design for file system operations
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:03:30 +
Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> Tho
> On 8 Feb 2019, at 10:43, Vitaly Fanaskov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've read QTBUG-47703 very carefully and I think that adding some file
> managers is overkill in this particular case.
I agree, QFile and QDir are natural places to look for such APIs.
Tor Arne
_
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:03:30 +
Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> Thoughts, ideas, and pointers to other frameworks that you believe provide a
> good API are welcome here in this email thread before moving to a dedicated
> JIRA ticket.
My personal pet peeve: Please, let's never again use the term
Hi all,
Just kindly reminder: API review for Qt 5.13 is ongoing. It seems there isn't
that much activity yet...
br,
Jani
From: Edward Welbourne
Sent: Monday, February 4, 2019 1:38 PM
To: Jani Heikkinen; development@qt-project.org
Cc: releas...@qt-project.
Hi,
I've read QTBUG-47703 very carefully and I think that adding some file managers
is overkill in this particular case. I would suggest the following changes:
1. Extract an abstract class (i.e., interface) for common file operations
2. Both QFile and QDir should implement this interface
11 matches
Mail list logo
