On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 07:35:45PM +0200, Aleksey Kontsevich wrote:
> Should I assign this regression to You as well:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-72687?
>
what makes you think that i introduced it?
> 02.01.2019, 18:47, "Oswald Buddenhagen" :
> > that applies to any _recent_ regressio
Hi Oswald,
Should I assign this regression to You as well:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-72687?
--
Best regards,
Aleksey
Linked in https://www.linkedin.com/in/alekseykontsevich
02.01.2019, 18:47, "Oswald Buddenhagen" :
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Bogdan Vatra via Dev
Thanks for pointing that out. I guess that could work. It's not as elegant as what I want, where everyhing presents the same way. Now each and every filter has to have
if (flags & QVideoFilterRunnable::LastInChain) {
... generate the frame for the backend per the surfaceFormat
}
As th
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Bogdan Vatra via Development wrote:
> I'm trying to compile Qt for Android and 5.12 branch received quite a lot
> configure changes which broke Android builds
> (though I thought that 5.12 branch is for bug fixes only).
>
the series did fix quite some b
On Wednesday, 2 January 2019 09:45:29 -02 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Because the information is not known to the compiler at compile time.
To be stricter: it *is* know to the compiler, but without a constexpr
reflection API, we can't get the information out of the compiler and into
code.
--
Thia
Hi,
I'm trying to compile Qt for Android and 5.12 branch received quite a lot
configure changes which broke Android builds (though I thought that 5.12 branch
is for bug fixes only).
Now configure mixes host libs with the target (android) ones, which IMHO is
very wrong when cross-compiling :)
On Monday, December 31, 2018 2:56:29 PM CET Marco Bubke wrote:
> Is it because the meta type information could be created later? What about
adding
> a constexpr version like: QMetaEnum::compileTimeFromType? Or do we wait for
> static reflections?
Yes, sometimes, but the fact that the output chang
On Monday, 31 December 2018 11:56:29 -02 Marco Bubke wrote:
> Is it not nice to share your knowledge why it is not possible? Is it
> because the meta type information could be created later? What about adding
> a constexpr version like: QMetaEnum::compileTimeFromType? Or do we wait for
> static re
On Wednesday, 2 January 2019 04:34:43 -02 Tony Sarajärvi wrote:
> agent:2019/01/01 20:15:26 build.go:193: Config: Using QtTest library 5.12.0,
> Qt 5.12.0 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC
> 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6))
This is a native x86-64 build and run. I
