On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 08:27:50AM +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > The problem we had with a namespaced Qt were: using external Qt
> > based libraries, which never tried to use a namespaced build, did
> > not build due to forward declarations, so I had to patch some of
> > them. But then, not al
Hi,
I am suffering from the already reported bug
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-64272. I am adding a gif and the memory
usage sky rocket to more than a GB. I have seen the bug is still open. is there
any suggested workaround to this issue?
I am using Qt 5.11.1. Thank you for your help!
On Thursday, 2 August 2018 23:03:06 PDT Martin Koller wrote:
> QT_FORWARD_DECLARE_CLASS(QTimer)
Easier to just put QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE before and QT_END_NAMESPACE after. It's
more verbose, but it's actually easier to read.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect
On Friday, 3 August 2018 02:06:11 PDT Oliver Wolff wrote:
> Is everyone ok with this change? The ANGLE update from Google (which
> uses a revision that still supports MSVC 2015) would be ready
> (https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/233385/), but we would like to
> use a newer version from Microso
On Thursday, 2 August 2018 23:46:07 PDT Jason Newton wrote:
> From OpenSUSE build service, here is the build time for the full
> OpenJDK 8 build
> https://build.opensuse.org/public/build/Java:Factory/openSUSE_Leap_15.0/x86_
> 64/java-1_8_0-openjdk/_log - 1976 seconds with what appears to be a singl
On Thursday, 2 August 2018 23:42:08 PDT BogDan Vatra via Development wrote:
> Sorry it's kinda off-topic. What I wanted to say is for Qt 6 to have a new
> SDK folders layout. Now each Qt target goes into a separate folder, but the
> bin, include (except a few files), doc, mkspecs, etc. folders are
On 8/3/18, 5:06 AM, "Development on behalf of Oliver Wolff"
wrote:
Hi,
Is everyone ok with this change? The ANGLE update from Google (which
uses a revision that still supports MSVC 2015) would be ready
(https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/233385/), but we would like to
Hi,
I would like to propose a change of where we get the ANGLE sources we
use in qtbase. At the moment we use Google's ANGLE
(https://github.com/google/angle). Unfortunately they stopped supporting
MSVC 2015 last year and their UWP code path does not build out of the
box. Microsoft (https://g
