On Sunday, 15 July 2018 12:06:05 PDT Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/222801/
>
> Is it resulting in an error, or is it just the warning you are seeing?
Uh, that's a good point. It's a warning. I guess my error is elsewhere in the
log file...
--
Thiago Macieira -
> On 15 Jul 2018, at 20:39, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> Twice an integration of mine resulted in
>
> ..\..\..\..\shared/emulationdetector.h:62:13: warning: 'bool
> EmulationDetector::isRunningArmOnX86()' defined but not used [-Wunused-
> function]
> static bool isRunningArmOnX86()
>
Twice an integration of mine resulted in
..\..\..\..\shared/emulationdetector.h:62:13: warning: 'bool
EmulationDetector::isRunningArmOnX86()' defined but not used [-Wunused-
function]
static bool isRunningArmOnX86()
^
Has something changed? if so, can whoever made the change ro
On Sonntag, 15. Juli 2018 12:57:46 CEST Gatis Paeglis wrote:
> > Raising the minimum Core Language to C++14 for Linux/XCB
>
> Ok, the title was bit misleading. You want to increase for all regular Linux
> builds.
>
> That would be fine for the task I linked earlier. But
>
> according to http://d
> Raising the minimum Core Language to C++14 for Linux/XCB
Ok, the title was bit misleading. You want to increase for all regular Linux
builds.
That would be fine for the task I linked earlier. But
according to http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/supported-platforms.html Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 6.6 does n
> There has been no reply on this subject. Shall I assume silence is consent and
> we can begin using C++14 constructs in the XCB plugin?
I think I know which patch you are talking about and then my answer is we
can't. The code that you
are looking at I want to eventually move in some common pl
