> On 1 Jun 2018, at 08:28, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 04:24:25 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev
> escreveu:
1. Is it still legal to incorporate "inline functions and templates"
into code not covered by LGPLv3? In particular, I'm interested in
qAsC
Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 04:24:25 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev
escreveu:
>>> 1. Is it still legal to incorporate "inline functions and templates"
>>> into code not covered by LGPLv3? In particular, I'm interested in
>>> qAsConst
On 17 Apr 2017, at 18:07, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> The
You are right. It seems that the connection to service in testresults.qt.io
keeps giving up on us. I just restarted coin, but I don’t know how to fix the
root cause. We have to investigate this more tomorrow morning.
Simo
On 31/05/2018, 23.38, "Development on behalf of Robin Burchell"
wrote:
https://testresults.qt.io/coin/ shows the last successful integration at ~4pm,
and the integrating list is full again:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/status:integrating,n,z
So I guess it's not fixed, or something else broke?
--
Robin Burchell
ro...@crimson.no
On Thu, May 31, 2018,
Confirmed, I was able to install 5.11 :-)
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 12:55 AM
> From: "Jani Heikkinen"
> To: "Jason H" , "development@qt-project.org"
>
> Cc: "inter...@qt-project.org" , "fro...@tungware.se"
>
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Maintenance Tool network error (OSX)
>
> Hi!
> This
This review has come to a conclusion. Based on reviews the major points have
settled. The highlights of the changes are:
- Internal Qt company requirements management will shift to public projects
- Renaming and reordering of components (breaks existing filters)
- Additional fields for Jira issue
The update introduced some unexpected “features”, which were reverted/fixed.
In addition to that, we suffered from infra related problems today. Those also
should be fixed by now.
Due to issues above, CI is a bit busy atm, so please be patient.
Simo
On 29/05/2018, 9.14, "Development on behalf
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> I ran benchmarks comparing a release build of 5.12 against 5.1.1 and ran
>> the benchmark mentioned in the task, where Qt 5.12 came out in average
>> faster by a factor of 4.
>
> Christophers comment in the JIRA ticket raises so
Hi Simon,
> I ran benchmarks comparing a release build of 5.12 against 5.1.1 and ran
> the benchmark mentioned in the task, where Qt 5.12 came out in average
> faster by a factor of 4.
Christophers comment in the JIRA ticket raises some questions concerning
the correctness of those benchmarks.
