On Thursday, 12 April 2018 01:42:29 PDT Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> And at this same time I want to propose that we stop delivering alpha or
> beta releases and just do snapshots instead. Publishing regular snapshots
> should be done until we are ready for RC. That because I don't see that
> much need
Hi all,
We have soft branched '5.11.0' from '5.11'. Please start using '5.11.0' for new
changes targeted to Qt 5.11.0 release. Final downmerge from '5.11' to '5.11.0'
will happen Thursday 19th April so there should be enough time to finalize
ongoing changes in '5.11' and start using '5.11.0' fo
On 4/12/18, 2:07 AM, "Development on behalf of Maurice Kalinowski"
wrote:
> > > Some tests shall need more than the binary; e.g. data files to act on.
> >
> [Kalinowski Maurice]
> Check for testdata or builtin_testdata, I do not recall the precise name
> right now.
>
> Basically you can spec
Hi all,
We have release Qt 5.9.5 today, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/04/12/qt-5-9-5-released/ .
Big thanks to everyone involved!
Br,
Jani
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
+1
Cheers,
Frederik
(And a big thank you to both Oliver and Maurice for cleaning up all kinds of
provisioning stuff on Windows lately!)
On mandag 9. april 2018 14.17.34 CEST Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some might have recognized my focus inside the Qt Company has shifted
> from Wi
Hi!
Please check if some 3rd party component needs to be updated for Qt 5.11
release. And of course do needed updates now :D
List of 3rd party components here:
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/licenses-used-in-qt.html
br,
Jani
___
Development mailing list
Devel
Hi,
It is time to start freezing Qt 5.12 schedule. We have the same "limitation" as
earlier; we should get the release out well before Christmas time. And it seems
we can't cut the time needed from FF to final release that much. It seems we
aren't necessarily needing those 17 weeks as before bu
