Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' ready

Hi! Is there a bug report about the issue? If this is nothing new I think we can wait Qt 5.9.6 for that fix br, Jani > -Original Message- > From: Alexandr Akulich > Sent: keskiviikko 14. maaliskuuta 2018 16.21 > To: Jani Heikkinen > Cc: development@qt-project.org; releas...@qt-project

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

On 03/14/2018 07:54 PM, Morten Sørvig wrote: > >> On 9 Mar 2018, at 13:57, Morten Sørvig wrote: >> >> * (No) thread support >> >> Wasm and Emscripten do have pthreads support. However this requires >> SharedArrayBuffer, >> which has been disabled in all major browser after recent security

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' ready

Hi Jani, Can we please get in a compilation fix for qreal configured as float? There is a very small yet critical issue with qMax in QFusionStyle. I submitted the fix [1] for 5.11 and it is approved, but I agreed to also fix the same line coding style issue before staging the change. I will subm

[Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' ready

Hi! Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.5' is now competed. From now on '5.9' if for Qt 5.9.6 and all changes targeted to Qt 5.9.5 release must be done in '5.9.5'. And as usual no any 'nice-to-haves' in '5.9.5' anymore! We are targeting to get Qt 5.9.5 out as soon as possible (during March) so please

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

> On 9 Mar 2018, at 13:57, Morten Sørvig wrote: > > * (No) thread support > > Wasm and Emscripten do have pthreads support. However this requires > SharedArrayBuffer, > which has been disabled in all major browser after recent security incidents. > > So we are looking to upstream a no-thr

Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

+1 Cheers, Lars On 13 Mar 2018, at 19:36, Gabriel de Dietrich mailto:gabriel.dedietr...@qt.io>> wrote: +1 Best regards, Dr. Gabriel de Dietrich Senior Software Developer The Qt Company On Mar 12, 2018, at 10:10 AM, Sérgio Martins mailto:sergio.mart...@kdab.com>> wrote: Hi, Although the w

Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly

> On 13 Mar 2018, at 15:27, Svenn-Arne Dragly wrote: > > I also think Qt for WebAssembly is exciting because it opens up the > possibility to show a minimal demo of a full application in the browser. > Instead of showing a video of the application on a product page, a small demo > with limit

[Development] Qt API review process (was: Re: Qt 5.11 Alpha released)

Hi all, We have API review ongoing for Qt 5.11. For me our process for that is a bit unclear; At which point we can say the review is really done? There are comments in the reviews but then pretty much nothing... At some there is -1, few +1 but that's it. I think we should clarify the process s