On 13/03/2018, 3.15, "Development on behalf of Jason H"
wrote:
>
>Sure. But how much refactoring is Qt going to accept without a commitment
> to the web agenda? How much prioritization will it be allowed? Will the Qt
> company
>support it as a real part of Qt? It's easy to say pat
+1 from me.
Cheers,
BogDan.
În ziua de luni, 12 martie 2018, la 19:10:35 EET, Sérgio Martins a scris:
> Hi,
>
>
> Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David
> Faure has been an unofficial maintainer.
> David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is
> On 03/12/2018 11:42 PM, Jason H wrote:
> > 1. True ActiveX was extremely limiting, NaCL less so, Emscripten/asm.js
> > less so. I can't really argue much difference between WebAssembly and
> > asm.js though, given asm.js's previous performance claims.
>
> In my experience WebAssembly is much m
12.03.2018, 20:10, "Sérgio Martins" :
> Hi,
>
> Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David
> Faure has been an unofficial maintainer.
> David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is
> someone you'll always want to add as reviewer.
>
> He's well know
+1
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
+1 from me
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:10:35PM +, Sérgio Martins wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David Faure
> has been an unofficial maintainer.
> David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is someone
> you'll always wan
Big +1
Cheers,
Samuel
> On 12 Mar 2018, at 18:10, Sérgio Martins wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David Faure
> has been an unofficial maintainer.
> David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is someone
> you'll always
On 03/12/2018 11:42 PM, Jason H wrote:
> 1. True ActiveX was extremely limiting, NaCL less so, Emscripten/asm.js less
> so. I can't really argue much difference between WebAssembly and asm.js
> though, given asm.js's previous performance claims.
In my experience WebAssembly is much more perfor
On Monday, 12 March 2018 11:20:21 PDT Sérgio Martins wrote:
> On 2018-03-12 17:59, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Monday, 12 March 2018 10:10:35 PDT Sérgio Martins wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David
> >> Faure has been an unofficia
On 2018-03-12 17:59, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 12 March 2018 10:10:35 PDT Sérgio Martins wrote:
Hi,
Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David
Faure has been an unofficial maintainer.
By Qt Models, do you mean the Item Models?
Yes
Regards,
--
Sérgio M
On Monday, 12 March 2018 10:10:35 PDT Sérgio Martins wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David
> Faure has been an unofficial maintainer.
By Qt Models, do you mean the Item Models?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Ar
Simon Hausmann (12 March 2018 09:29)
> I filed QTBUG-67010 to track the issue. Preliminary investigation suggests
> that this only affects 5.11 and dev as a consequence of the TZ changes
> introduced with QTBUG-56787.
The test was flawed.
https://github.com/tc39/test262/issues/1486
Closed (for
Hi,
Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David
Faure has been an unofficial maintainer.
David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is
someone you'll always want to add as reviewer.
He's well known in the community and already maintains QtXmlPat
Thanks!
I did:
$ pkg-config --libs libwebp libwebpmux libwebpdemux
Package libwebpmux was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libwebpmux.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'libwebpmux' found
Then I saw that libwebpmux w
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 at 7:29 AM
> From: "Morten Sørvig"
> To: "Qt Project Development Mailing-List"
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly
>
>
>
> > On 9 Mar 2018, at 19:09, Tim Murison wrote:
> > I'd also like to echo and hopefully amplify what Jason H said about
> > qmlw
> Oh, who knows what will happen. But there are indicators that this time
> may be different:
>
>1. WebAssembly is a web standard
>2. General support for web applications is getting better (e.g. service
> workers)
>3. Canvas-rendering web apps now exist (Google Sheets)
>4. Better
> On 9 Mar 2018, at 19:09, Tim Murison wrote:
> I'd also like to echo and hopefully amplify what Jason H said about
> qmlweb. IMO, this is the solution that Qt should be embracing and
> integrating upstream. qmlweb aims to do what Qt has always done, make
> cross-platform development easy, effic
> On 9 Mar 2018, at 15:53, Jason H wrote:
>
>
> I don't want to steal your thunder, but what is fundamentally different about
> this approach this time? Why will the results be any different?
Oh, who knows what will happen. But there are indicators that this time
may be different:
* Web
Hi
With 'system-webengine-webp' option you are trying to force qwebenigne
to use system webp. WebEngine uses pkg-config for webp, there is no
separate test, you can check it yourself with:
pkg-config --libs libwebp libwebpmux libwebpdemux
Br
Michal
On 03/12/2018 11:07 AM, YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-Lis
Hello,
I am trying to build Qt 5.10.1 on Slackware64 14.2 with the
"-system-webengine-webp" option and libwebp 0.6.1:
---
$ ./configure -v \
[...]
-system-assimp \
-system-doubleconversion \
-system-freetype \
-system-harfbuzz \
-system-libjpeg \
-s
Hi,
I filed QTBUG-67010 to track the issue. Preliminary investigation suggests that
this only affects 5.11 and dev as a consequence of the TZ changes introduced
with QTBUG-56787.
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Simon Hausmann
Sent: Sunday, March 11,
21 matches
Mail list logo
