> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2018 at 3:05 PM
> From: "Tim Murison"
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly
>
>
> > Thanks Tim, I'm glad to know I'm not the only one. I *highly*
> > recommend the Wt toolkit (https://www.webtoolkit.eu/widgets) , even
> > if i
> Thanks Tim, I'm glad to know I'm not the only one. I *highly*
> recommend the Wt toolkit (https://www.webtoolkit.eu/widgets) , even
> if it's not LGPL. The Widget gallery is implemented in Wt, and you
> can see they have everything, and even a working TreeView! Your
> QWidget experience will tra
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2018 at 1:09 PM
> From: "Tim Murison"
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt for WebAssembly
>
> >
...
> >
>
> +1, I couldn't agree more with this sentiment.
>
> I work in software consulting doing mobile and web work. While Qt has a
> comp
Hi, I would like to add...
One of the guys over at https://qtmob.slack.com keeps a demonstration of
the Qt examples for Qt Webassembly (thanks David!):
https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/wasm-qt-examples/last/index.html
Not all of the examples work, and not all of them work correctly.
Firefox
Hello All,
I am a Masters Student in Computer Engineering Program at Arizona State
University. I am interested in participating in Google Summer of Code
(GSoC)
2018 with Qt as my mentor
organization. In this mail, I would like to propose a new feature for Qt
Creator
as my GSoC proj
>
> While I am excited about this, I still wonder that it's the right
> approach. By right, I mean scalable.
> After evaluating the WebGL platform (which I was excited about as
> well) had having extreme performance issues, I foresee that this will
> has performance issues as well, because of one
Hello All,
I am a Masters Student in Computer Engineering Program at Arizona State
University. I am interested in participating in Google Summer of Code 2018
with Qt as my mentor organisation. I went through all the projects
mentioned here - https://wiki.qt.io/Google_Summer_of_Code/2018/Project_Id
While I am excited about this, I still wonder that it's the right approach. By
right, I mean scalable.
After evaluating the WebGL platform (which I was excited about as well) had
having extreme performance issues, I foresee that this will has performance
issues as well, because of one defect:
Hi all,
As you may have noticed work on Qt for WebAssembly is underway. With the
recent updates the wip/webassembly branches are now based on Qt 5.11, which
they will continue to be while we work on bringing up Qt Quick. The tracking
bug for the project is QTBUG-63917 (with subtasks). This is a co
Hi
We'd like to have a small maintenance break. If the suggested time doesn't fit
you at all, please contact us and we'll reschedule.
Purpose: We'd like to update the firmware on the hardware running Coin.
-Tony
___
Development mailing list
Developmen
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz Olszak
> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2018 10:13 AM
> Cc: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Is Qt Quick Item properties order significant?
>
> Yes,
Yes, I would like to thank Simon and Mitch for taking care of this.
The prospect of spending few days on reviewing code and rearranging
properties was not making me happy :)
2018-03-09 1:44 GMT+01:00 Jason H :
> Neat! I've never seen a patch land that fast! I'm going to be happy with this
> one!
12 matches
Mail list logo
