> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Kofler
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 March 2018 3:06 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Making QObject::dumpObjectTree() and
> QObject::dumpObject
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 07:42:59 PST Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> -DQT_NO_NARROWING_CONVERSIONS_IN_CONNECT -DQT_BUILD_CORE_LIB
[cut]
> arch/qatomic_bootstrap.h -o .obj/header_qatomic_bootstrap.obj
This is a header check of a file that shouldn't be header-checked. The header
in question (qatomic_boots
(I posted the error message one extra time)
--
Carry a towel
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
[1] Join Alexei Fedotov @linkedin, http://ru.linkedin.com/in/dataved/
[2] Join Alexei Fedotov @facebook, http://www.facebook.com/openmeetings
[3] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, http://openmeetin
Thiago, here is a required info
1) the command line extracted from the log which reproduces the error,
D:/compilers/gcc-linaro-7.1.1-2017.08-i686-mingw32_arm-linux-gnueabihf/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++
-c -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon -mthumb -march=armv7-a
-mtune=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neo
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 07:04:52 PST Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Hi Edward,
> After I learned that configure needs -recheck and cleaned the
> workspace, I cannot build Qt that
> far to check the fix. I get the problem with QAtomicOpsSupport with
> the last branch and some other problems with different
Hi Edward,
After I learned that configure needs -recheck and cleaned the
workspace, I cannot build Qt that
far to check the fix. I get the problem with QAtomicOpsSupport with
the last branch and some other problems with different branches
"is not a class template
template<> struct QAtomicOpsSupport
Mitch Curtis wrote:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/221758/ makes
> QObject::dumpObjectTree() and QObject::dumpObjectInfo() invokable so that
> they can be used from QML.
Would this have any security impact? I'm thinking of issues like ASLR bypass
or other information leakage, if these en
2018-03-06 11:50 GMT+01:00 Mitch Curtis :
> *From:* Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=
> qt...@qt-project.org] *On Behalf Of *Pierre-Yves Siret
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 6 March 2018 11:29 AM
> *To:* André Somers
> *Cc:* Qt development mailing list
> *Subject:* Re: [Development] Maki
From: Development
[mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Pierre-Yves Siret
Sent: Tuesday, 6 March 2018 11:29 AM
To: André Somers
Cc: Qt development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Development] Making QObject::dumpObjectTree() and
QObject::dumpObjectInfo() invoka
2018-03-06 11:12 GMT+01:00 André Somers :
>
>
> On 06/03/2018 11:04, Mitch Curtis wrote:
>
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/221758/ makes
>> QObject::dumpObjectTree() and QObject::dumpObjectInfo() invokable so that
>> they can be used from QML. I think that this could be useful to debug
>>
On 06/03/2018 11:04, Mitch Curtis wrote:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/221758/ makes QObject::dumpObjectTree()
and QObject::dumpObjectInfo() invokable so that they can be used from QML. I
think that this could be useful to debug issues, but being such a widely used
and important clas
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/221758/ makes QObject::dumpObjectTree()
and QObject::dumpObjectInfo() invokable so that they can be used from QML. I
think that this could be useful to debug issues, but being such a widely used
and important class, I'm a bit unsure about whether it's worth
Coin update has finished and the service is back up.
Kind regards/Ystävällisin terveisin,
Aapo Keskimölö
> On 6 Mar 2018, at 10.15, Aapo Keskimölö wrote:
>
> Coin will be taken down to fix storage where some binary artifacts are
> missing.
>
> We will also update production at the same time w
Il 06/03/2018 01:42, Kevin Kofler ha scritto:
I would also like to point out that the actual gain of having an
append(QVector &&) over the current append(const QVector &) would be
very limited. At best you would save a pair of atomic integer operations.
No, because the former would move all ele
Coin will be taken down to fix storage where some binary artifacts are missing.
We will also update production at the same time with new baseline.
The expected downtime should be less than an hour.
Kind regards/Ystävällisin terveisin,
Aapo Keskimölö
_
15 matches
Mail list logo