On Montag, 18. Dezember 2017 18:53:55 CET Toan Pham wrote:
> "/TOOLCHAIN/loop/target/nicebox/sandbox/qt-everywhere-src-5.10.0/qtwebengine
> /src/3rdparty/chromium/tools/gn/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 45, in
> check_call
> subprocess.check_call(cmd, cwd=GN_ROOT, **kwargs)
> File "/usr/lib/py
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:22:31AM -0500, Adam Treat wrote:
> 3) Private API being changed out from under
>
3a) yet unreleased public api being revised.
there is just no reasonable way to claim that the pain inflicted by the
5-stage workaround is a good thing. it's a barely acceptable thing given
Hi
It looks like the build can not proceed because of lack of working
ninja. Qt configure detects system ninja, and in case it does not work
builds internal one. In case for some reason this failed you can
still force the build to use internal ninja with configure option:
-no-feature-webengine-sy
On Monday, 18 December 2017 09:53:55 PST Toan Pham wrote:
> 1. 32 bit LXC container (ubuntu 16.04 32bit)
> The build is still compiling chronium web-engine for the last an hr
> and a half. So far, I haven't had much problem w/ this one except that I
> had to comment out a few lines in qtwebe
Thiago,
I am running two parallel builds at the moment, and they are:
1. 32 bit LXC container (ubuntu 16.04 32bit)
The build is still compiling chronium web-engine for the last an hr
and a half. So far, I haven't had much problem w/ this one except that I
had to comment out a few lines i
On Monday, 18 December 2017 07:46:24 PST Toan Pham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having multiple problems w/ building qt5.10 w/ webengine support for
> linux 32bit. Before I proceed further down that road, I would like to know
> if there's a pre-built version of qt5.10.0 w/ webengine for linux 32bit
> so
Hi,
I am having multiple problems w/ building qt5.10 w/ webengine support for
linux 32bit. Before I proceed further down that road, I would like to know
if there's a pre-built version of qt5.10.0 w/ webengine for linux 32bit
somewhere?
thank you and have a good day,
TP
On 12/18/2017 05:24 AM, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
On czwartek, 7 grudnia 2017 12:17:16 CET Adam Treat wrote:
Hi,
I think it is high time that we fix the underlying problem: supporting
atomic commits across submodules.
As I'm not against the idea, I'm not really fan of it either. The problem wit
Hi,
Akseli will check the percentages from Qt 5.10 online installer later this
week.
Yours,
Tuukka
On 16/12/2017, 18.25, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 10:57:32 PST Alex Blasche wrote:
> Sorry, no. As mentioned during the co
On czwartek, 7 grudnia 2017 12:17:16 CET Adam Treat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it is high time that we fix the underlying problem: supporting
> atomic commits across submodules.
As I'm not against the idea, I'm not really fan of it either. The problem with
atomic commits across submodules is that t
10 matches
Mail list logo
