Re: [Development] COIN failures on dev

2017-12-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 11 December 2017 08:47:41 PST Adam Treat wrote: > Whenever I discover something seemingly broken in an area of code I'm > unfamiliar with I first suspect I don't understand something... > > Right now I'm looking for the last successful dev branch integration on > qt5 supermodule and I c

Re: [Development] COIN failures on dev

2017-12-11 Thread Adam Treat
Whenever I discover something seemingly broken in an area of code I'm unfamiliar with I first suspect I don't understand something... Right now I'm looking for the last successful dev branch integration on qt5 supermodule and I can not find it. I've gone back to before Thanksgiving. Can this

[Development] COIN failures on dev

2017-12-11 Thread Adam Treat
Hi, For the past few business days we've all witnessed failures on dev branch like this: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/213309/ Seems that something broke with provisioning on macOS or something. I see this https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214045/ attempt to fix, but that is also

Re: [Development] QtBase broken in 5.9 and 5.10. Fix is already inbound.

2017-12-11 Thread Liang Qi
5.10 was fixed. — Liang > On 11 Dec 2017, at 12:22, Liang Qi wrote: > > 5.9 was fixed. The merge to 5.10 is on the way. > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214051/ > > dev is blocked by "Module "" () Failed to provision template > 'qtci-osx-10.11-x86_64-3-9946c2’:” issue, should be fixed

Re: [Development] QtBase broken in 5.9 and 5.10. Fix is already inbound.

2017-12-11 Thread Liang Qi
5.9 was fixed. The merge to 5.10 is on the way. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214051/ dev is blocked by "Module "" () Failed to provision template 'qtci-osx-10.11-x86_64-3-9946c2’:” issue, should be fixed by following change: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214045/ — Liang > On 11

[Development] QtBase broken in 5.9 and 5.10. Fix is already inbound.

2017-12-11 Thread Tony Sarajärvi
Hi QtBase in 5.9 and 5.10 are broken currently. We found the bug, and it was sadly approved by yours sincerely :/ Fix is inbound: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214032/ -Tony ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.q