On 4 December 2017 at 21:29, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>> > I believe the name "optional" comes from Haskell and Java where it
>> > appeared
>> > first. The standard library only imports things that are already industry
>> > standard, and once there were several implementations of optional out
On Montag, 4. Dezember 2017 15:30:49 CET Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> On 4 December 2017 at 16:20, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > On Montag, 4. Dezember 2017 15:00:53 CET Marc Mutz wrote:
> >> Ah, well, yes. Nothing truly originates in C++, true. But, IIRC, the
> >> Haskell name is maybe. So why i
On 4 Dec 2017, at 15:16, Albert Astals Cid
mailto:albert.astals@kdab.com>> wrote:
El dilluns, 20 de novembre de 2017, a les 23:45:18 CET, Thiago Macieira va
escriure:
On segunda-feira, 20 de novembro de 2017 14:01:25 PST GMAIL wrote:
This bug has been reported on QT ( see
https://bugreports
On Monday, 4 December 2017 06:00:53 PST Marc Mutz wrote:
> Ah, well, yes. Nothing truly originates in C++, true. But, IIRC, the
> Haskell name is maybe. So why is it QOptional and not QMaybe? Because
> the C++ interface is used as the basis, not something from Haskell.
FYI, I wrote QMaybe some 9 t
04.12.2017, 17:31, "Ville Voutilainen" :
> On 4 December 2017 at 16:20, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>> On Montag, 4. Dezember 2017 15:00:53 CET Marc Mutz wrote:
>>> Ah, well, yes. Nothing truly originates in C++, true. But, IIRC, the
>>> Haskell name is maybe. So why is it QOptional and not
On 4 December 2017 at 16:20, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Montag, 4. Dezember 2017 15:00:53 CET Marc Mutz wrote:
>>
>> Ah, well, yes. Nothing truly originates in C++, true. But, IIRC, the
>> Haskell name is maybe. So why is it QOptional and not QMaybe? Because
>> the C++ interface is used as
On Montag, 4. Dezember 2017 15:00:53 CET Marc Mutz wrote:
>
> Ah, well, yes. Nothing truly originates in C++, true. But, IIRC, the
> Haskell name is maybe. So why is it QOptional and not QMaybe? Because
> the C++ interface is used as the basis, not something from Haskell.
>
I believe the name "o
El dilluns, 20 de novembre de 2017, a les 23:45:18 CET, Thiago Macieira va
escriure:
> On segunda-feira, 20 de novembro de 2017 14:01:25 PST GMAIL wrote:
> > This bug has been reported on QT ( see
> > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-54464) on *June 2016*. Almost a
> > year and half now, the
On 2017-12-03 22:57, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
On Samstag, 2. Dezember 2017 17:48:19 CET Marc Mutz wrote:
If that analyis were true, you'd need to explain why it is, then, that
the Qt containers now have more or less the same API as std ones, when
in Qt 1 they were very different. And why I k
Hi,
We have released Qt 5.10.0 RC3 today. Delta to RC2 as an attachment.
With my current knowledge this should be now final Qt 5.10.0 content which we
are planning to release this Thursday (if all still ok according to tests).
Instructions how to get the release are here:
https://wiki.qt.io/How
Hi,
We currently have a WIP branch in Qt Base for the WebAssembly work, but
it turns out that we will also need changes in Qt Declarative that
significant enough that it would be good to keep them in a WIP branch
until we merge the feature back.
No CI needed.
--
Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
S
11 matches
Mail list logo
