Hi,
We really should think about some more or less automatic policy about
supported platforms. Discussing that on each release is not great nor for us,
nor for our users. It takes time, to discuss it. I guess that from outside it
is looking as a complete chaos, especially in context of LTS,
Hi,
Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.3' is now completed. From now on '5.9' is for
changes targeting to '5.9.4' release.
Plan is to get remaining Qt 5.9.3 changes files in '5.9.3' as well as possible
fixes for open blockers & then get the Qt 5.9.3 release out. Target for the
release is week 46 so
On 8 November 2017 at 21:27, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 09.11.2017, 00:20, "Thiago Macieira" :
> > There was another thread since then that discussed that. I remember the
> > conclusion, but not the details.
>
> Here it is:
>
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-June/030178.h
09.11.2017, 00:20, "Thiago Macieira" :
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 12:54:16 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote:
>> OK, thanks anyway. I remember this discussion:
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-April/029762.html
>>
>> That seemed to conclude that there should be no problem m
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 12:54:16 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote:
> OK, thanks anyway. I remember this discussion:
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-April/029762.html
>
> That seemed to conclude that there should be no problem mixing 2015 with
> 2017. Was just wondering if the
On 8 November 2017 at 19:31, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 10:21:05 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote:
> > Could you please elaborate on the problems that were found?
>
> Sorry, I don't remember. Probably something related to the fact that
> constexpr
> is broken in MSVC 2015, so i
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 10:21:05 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 8 November 2017 at 15:24, Thiago Macieira
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:06:51 PST Roland Winklmeier wrote:
> > > One question: How likely are the chances that the prebuilt MSVC 32 bit
> > > packages will be bui
>From: Shawn Rutledge
>> On 18 Oct 2017, at 07:34, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>> We discussed about this last spring and then the decision was that 5.10 is
>> too early but 5.11 might be possible.
> So can we get that done soon on dev branch?
Sorry, no. As mentioned during the contributor summit, t
On 8 November 2017 at 15:24, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:06:51 PST Roland Winklmeier wrote:
> > One question: How likely are the chances that the prebuilt MSVC 32 bit
> > packages will be built with MSVC 2017 instead of 2015? As far as I know,
> > the v140 toolset in
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:06:51 PST Roland Winklmeier wrote:
> One question: How likely are the chances that the prebuilt MSVC 32 bit
> packages will be built with MSVC 2017 instead of 2015? As far as I know,
> the v140 toolset in VS 2015 and the v141 toolset in VS 2017 are binary
> compatib
Jani Heikkinen (8 November 2017 11:29) poked all about 5.9.3's change
files. I note that many 5.10 API reviews [0] also remain unresolved -
indeed, six appear to be untouched by anyone but me:
* qt3d, qtx11extras, qtandroidextras, qtscxml, qtnetworkauth,
qtremoteobjects
Four have had a +1 befor
Hi all,
There is still quite many changes files under construction, see
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/message:%22file+for+Qt+5.9.3%22,n,z
Please finalize ongoing ones now; we are targeting to get Qt 5.9.3 out during
next week so we need to get final content in as soon as possible.
+2 st
2017-11-01 11:59 GMT+01:00 Jani Heikkinen :
>
> Qt 5.10 beta3 is out. Instructions how to get the release are here:
> https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer.
>
Hi Jani,
first of all thanks a lot for this new way of shipping beta versions. It is
so much nicer now to just run
13 matches
Mail list logo
