Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/webassembly in Qt Base

Hi, > On 21 Oct 2017, at 12:57 am, Oswald Buddenhagen > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: >> I would like to request a WIP branch in Qt Base: wip/webassembly >> >> Purpose is for the development of Qt for WebAssembly >> (http://webassembly

[Development] qtbase 5.9 is locked down for the time being

Hi, all, Since Oct. 20, only one change landed in qtbase 5.9, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/209093/ I will try to do manual stage in qtbase 5.9 to check whether it is because flakiness test or others. —Liang ___ Development mailing list Deve

Re: [Development] QtCS 2017 logging/tracing session notes

Hi, Regarding ETW, I found this blog post interesting as they are pursuing very similar goals wrt to convenience of trace analysis vs performance of tracing: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vancem/2015/09/20/rich-payload-data-in-eventsource-v4-6/ It points to a slightly more detailed explanation

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

On Montag, 23. Oktober 2017 23:48:07 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 23 October 2017 14:13:02 PDT Jake Petroules wrote: > > I believe we use qemu for the CI machines anyways, so we could probably > > emulate a ppc or mips CPU running Debian quite easily. > > Given the choice, I'd say MIPS