Re: [Development] QtCS 2017 QtCore sessions

2017-10-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 05:49:48 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > Move to the containers session: > * use qssize_t By the way, re: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-47629 We should use 64-bit in QJsonPrivate too. Specifically, because of the way that the internal binary JSON format stores va

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-20 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
20.10.2017, 18:14, "Thiago Macieira" : > On Friday, 20 October 2017 07:09:26 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  I've found this on Intel side: >> >>  https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/628867 >> >>  I hope Thiago can tell us more about this option. >> >>  I know PathScale had bi-endian compiler

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 20 October 2017 07:09:26 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > I've found this on Intel side: > > https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/628867 > > I hope Thiago can tell us more about this option. > > I know PathScale had bi-endian compiler in the past, but I don't know if > it's possible t

Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/webassembly in Qt Base

2017-10-20 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: > I would like to request a WIP branch in Qt Base: wip/webassembly > > Purpose is for the development of Qt for WebAssembly > (http://webassembly.org) > how does this relate to this effort? https://codereview.qt-project.

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-20 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
20.10.2017, 17:03, "Ville Voutilainen" : > On 20 October 2017 at 16:59, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  20.10.2017, 16:55, "Dmitry Shachnev" : >>>  On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:23:58PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:   Are there any supported platforms that we do not test in the CI? Probably

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-20 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 20 October 2017 at 16:59, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > 20.10.2017, 16:55, "Dmitry Shachnev" : >> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:23:58PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> Are there any supported platforms that we do not test in the CI? Probably >>> INTEGRITY? >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> So the ques

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-20 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
20.10.2017, 16:55, "Dmitry Shachnev" : > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:23:58PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>  Are there any supported platforms that we do not test in the CI? Probably >>  INTEGRITY? >> >>  [...] >> >>  So the question is: are there any platforms that could break even after >>  pa

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-20 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:23:58PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Are there any supported platforms that we do not test in the CI? Probably > INTEGRITY? > > [...] > > So the question is: are there any platforms that could break even after > passing the CI check? It would help us (Debian) a lot i

Re: [Development] [Interest] [Qt3D] Mixing C++ and QML

2017-10-20 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> On 20 Oct 2017, at 12:33, Sean Harmer wrote: > > Hi, > > On 19/10/2017 19:44, Shawn Rutledge wrote: >> >> What exactly do you think should be done there, in case we can fix it >> some day? > > Probably something like how NSObject manages properties of collections. So > far with Qt3D we've

[Development] vertical text layout and https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/73319/2

2017-10-20 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
I'm looking into vertical text layout in Qt, and the only things I've been able to find are this old patch: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/73319/2 and the relevant https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-529 . I am wondering whether: * there have been some other efforts since then that I jus

Re: [Development] [Interest] [Qt3D] Mixing C++ and QML

2017-10-20 Thread Sean Harmer
On 20/10/2017 09:06, Pierre-Yves Siret wrote: 2017-10-19 20:44 GMT+02:00 Shawn Rutledge mailto:shawn.rutle...@qt.io>>: (thread started on the interest list, but I don’t think my comments belong there) On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:06, Sean Harmer mailto:sean.har...@kdab.com>> wrote:

Re: [Development] [Interest] [Qt3D] Mixing C++ and QML

2017-10-20 Thread Sean Harmer
Hi, On 19/10/2017 19:44, Shawn Rutledge wrote: (thread started on the interest list, but I don’t think my comments belong there) On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:06, Sean Harmer wrote: Hi, you've hit one of the issues we did with exposing C++ and QML APIs. Namely, QQmlListProperty. This thing should

[Development] Branch request: wip/webassembly in Qt Base

2017-10-20 Thread Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
Hi, I would like to request a WIP branch in Qt Base: wip/webassembly Purpose is for the development of Qt for WebAssembly (http://webassembly.org) No CI is needed for this. -- Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt Senior Manager, R&D The Qt Company Sandakerveien 116 0484 Oslo, Norway eskil.abrahamsen-

Re: [Development] [Interest] [Qt3D] Mixing C++ and QML

2017-10-20 Thread Pierre-Yves Siret
2017-10-19 20:44 GMT+02:00 Shawn Rutledge : > (thread started on the interest list, but I don’t think my comments belong > there) > > On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:06, Sean Harmer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > you've hit one of the issues we did with exposing C++ and QML APIs. > Namely, QQmlListProperty. Thi