Hi Alex,
On Dienstag, 29. August 2017 13:18:02 CEST Alex Blasche wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Development [mailto:development-
> > bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Martin Koller
>
> > In Qt 5.9 I find that the following ctor is marked
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 07:49:37PM +0200, Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> > what are you talking about? https://codereview.qt-project.org/201311 is up
> > for
> > more than a month already.
> [Kalinowski Maurice]
> And it is visible now after Frederik moved it. As I wrote in my initial mail,
> there
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 14:49:37 -03 Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> > what are you talking about? https://codereview.qt-project.org/201311 is up
> > for more than a month already.
>
> [Kalinowski Maurice]
> And it is visible now after Frederik moved it. As I wrote in my initial
> mail, there has
> >
> what are you talking about? https://codereview.qt-project.org/201311 is up for
> more than a month already.
[Kalinowski Maurice]
And it is visible now after Frederik moved it. As I wrote in my initial mail,
there has been some work done before...
Maurice
_
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:32:43AM +0200, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> I'm a bit split here, let's try to find some middle ground :)
>
> I do think that we should always run with accessibility enabled
I don't.
Optional services should be opt-in, not opt-out.
Always.
Out of principle.
And no, I
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 14:04:14 -03 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:29:44AM -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 05:09:19 -03 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > # ifndef QT_FIXED_SHA3
> > >
> > >QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 10, 0) Sha3_224 = 7
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:06:23PM +, Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> a new repository is needed.
>
what are you talking about? https://codereview.qt-project.org/201311 is
up for more than a month already.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-proj
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:29:44AM -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 05:09:19 -03 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > # ifndef QT_FIXED_SHA3
> >QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 10, 0) Sha3_224 = 7,
> >QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 10, 0) Sha3_256,
> >QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 05:09:19 -03 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> # ifndef QT_FIXED_SHA3
>QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 10, 0) Sha3_224 = 7,
>QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 10, 0) Sha3_256,
>QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 10, 0) Sha3_384,
>QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 10, 0) Sha3_512,
> #
-- Mensaje reenviado --
De: "Samuel Thibault"
Fecha: 5 sep. 2017 5:40 a.m.
Asunto: Re: [Development] Bug#874054: Setting
QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON=1 has a huge negative performance impact,
should not be always on
Para: "Frederik Gladhorn"
Cc: , "Allan Sandfeld Jensen" ,
, "
-- Mensaje reenviado --
De: "Samuel Thibault"
Fecha: 3 sep. 2017 4:39 p.m.
Asunto: Re: Bug#874054: Setting QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON=1 has a
huge negative performance impact, should not be always on
Para: "Allan Sandfeld Jensen" , "Lisandro Damián Nicanor
Pérez Meyer" , "Seb
-- Mensaje reenviado --
De: "Samuel Thibault"
Fecha: 3 sep. 2017 4:17 p.m.
Asunto: Re: Bug#874054: Setting QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON=1 has a
huge negative performance impact, should not be always on
Para: "Allan Sandfeld Jensen" , "Lisandro Damián Nicanor
Pérez Meyer" , "Seb
-- Mensaje reenviado --
De: "Samuel Thibault"
Fecha: 3 sep. 2017 3:34 p.m.
Asunto: Re: Bug#874054: Setting QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON=1 has a
huge negative performance impact, should not be always on
Para: "Allan Sandfeld Jensen"
Cc: "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" , "
On Monday, September 4, 2017 11:58:13 AM CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > True, but we can re-evaluate if it is not working, modularization is
> > harder
> > in general as it requires some code changes. Regarding the "two weeks"
> > delay, it is mostly a social problem, as we can not agree on how of
I'm a bit split here, let's try to find some middle ground :)
I do think that we should always run with accessibility enabled and we don't
do that for a reason.
One thing to fix for linux accessibility is listening to the change signal on
for a11y being enabled or not. If I recall correctly list
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 06:57:38AM +, Lars Knoll wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2017, at 14:12, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > 2) enum names
> > I'd like to do:
> >
> >Keccak_224 = 7,
> >Keccak_256,
> >Keccak_384,
> >Keccak_512
> >RealSha3_224 = 11,
> >RealSha3_
OK, I'll create the repository, we can still merge several projects later as
seen fit.
Cheers,
Frederik
On fredag 1. september 2017 14.06.23 CEST Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Most of you might have noticed the IoT related discussion happening on this
> mailing list. If not, che
17 matches
Mail list logo
