On Samstag, 5. August 2017 03:48:00 CEST Paul Smedley wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> You may or may not be aware, that OS/2 has a Qt port that is currently
> at v4.7.3 (http://trac.netlabs.org/qt4)
>
> This project has stagnated for time, but I need at least Qt 4.8.x for
> Wireshark 2.4.0 - so I've started
Hi All,
You may or may not be aware, that OS/2 has a Qt port that is currently
at v4.7.3 (http://trac.netlabs.org/qt4)
This project has stagnated for time, but I need at least Qt 4.8.x for
Wireshark 2.4.0 - so I've started looking at updating.
I have Qt 4.8.x building, with a few nits still
Perfect, thank you Edward.
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 2:10 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> Patrick Stinson (3 August 2017 18:43)
>> I have filed bug reports before but am not sure where the line between
>> bug discovery and bug reporting is. For example in this case I am
>> partly asking if widget foc
On tirsdag 1. august 2017 15.11.38 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> No, another problem has now appeared:
>
> Module "qt/qtbase" (34adca0607ff9231b4c79949353827c1c8319c52) Failed
> repeatedly to launch build/test agent:
> Failed 7 times to acquire the hardware
> buildKey: qt/qtbase/eab0f32
Patrick Stinson (3 August 2017 18:43)
> I have filed bug reports before but am not sure where the line between
> bug discovery and bug reporting is. For example in this case I am
> partly asking if widget focus is supposed to work this way to avoid a
> superfluous bug report. But it sounds like I s
