Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Alejandro Exojo
On Saturday 22 July 2017 18:51:28 Phil Bouchard wrote: > You're probably making a living off memory leaks so it's obvious you get > offended but I don't think being a counterproductive manager is good for > the Qt company. In fact it's the first time ever I hear about a manager > complaining abo

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Phil Bouchard
You're probably making a living off memory leaks so it's obvious you get offended but I don't think being a counterproductive manager is good for the Qt company. In fact it's the first time ever I hear about a manager complaining about new technologies that is better and... free. On 07/22/201

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Jake Petroules
Regardless, he has a point: in more diplomatic terms, this thread and those preceding it are not promoting useful discourse, so I'd encourage others to refrain from posting further replies, and let this thread die out. Sent from my iPhone - the most secure mobile device - via the Verizon network

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Phil Bouchard
Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Saturday, 22 July 2017 09:22:38 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >> - Replace all pointer or gc types with the 'auto' keyword in the QML parser >> - Use standard 'operator new' > > You have no idea how difficult this may be. It just looks easy because you > haven't tried. >

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Phil Bouchard
Oleg Khotskin wrote: > Does anyone take this dumbass seriously? > I bet you have a better solution ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread James McDonnell
That's the sort of comment that drives new people away from open source projects. Please refrain from making such comments. Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device - via the Rogers Network From: o.khots...@gmail.com Sent: July 22, 2017 2:06 PM To: philipp...@gmail.com Cc: developm

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Oleg Khotskin
Does anyone take this dumbass seriously? -- Best regards, Oleg ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Saturday, 22 July 2017 09:22:38 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > - Replace all pointer or gc types with the 'auto' keyword in the QML parser > - Use standard 'operator new' You have no idea how difficult this may be. It just looks easy because you haven't tried. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieir

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Phil Bouchard
Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote: > over C++ ?? No it's much faster than the Javascript -> JIT flow. > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > >> On 07/22/2017 05:52 AM, Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote: >> >>> Phil, >>> Can you please explain benefits of having C++ -> WebAssembly ? >>> >> >>

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Vlad Stelmahovsky
over C++ ?? On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/22/2017 05:52 AM, Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote: > >> Phil, >> Can you please explain benefits of having C++ -> WebAssembly ? >> > > Assembling speed (about 20% faster) and execution speed (about 3.5x > faster): > http://webasse

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Phil Bouchard
On 07/22/2017 12:01 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: On 21 July 2017 at 17:48, Phil Bouchard wrote: For a web engine I don't think it's possible to swap the Javascript engine entirely but it is possible to introduce the BB++ -> C++ -> WebAssembly sequence. For the QML / Javascript dual then it cou

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 21 July 2017 at 17:48, Phil Bouchard wrote: > For a web engine I don't think it's possible to swap the Javascript engine > entirely but it is possible to introduce the BB++ -> C++ -> WebAssembly > sequence. > > For the QML / Javascript dual then it could be replaced by with the QML / > BB++ dua

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Phil Bouchard
On 07/22/2017 05:52 AM, Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote: Phil, Can you please explain benefits of having C++ -> WebAssembly ? Assembling speed (about 20% faster) and execution speed (about 3.5x faster): http://webassembly.org/docs/faq/ Regards, -Phil ___ D

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

2017-07-22 Thread Vlad Stelmahovsky
Phil, Can you please explain benefits of having C++ -> WebAssembly ? thanks On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/21/2017 02:10 AM, Lorn Potter wrote: > >> >> On 21 Jul 2017, at 2:22 pm, Phil Bouchard wrote: >>> >>> >>> So I would like to know if Qt thinks what I am pro