Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

2017-07-10 Thread Phil Bouchard
On 07/10/2017 05:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017 11:56:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: Phil Bouchard wrote: BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do In fact, is it me or it would seem that: - converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly -

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

2017-07-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017 11:56:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > Phil Bouchard wrote: > > BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do > > In fact, is it me or it would seem that: > - converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly > - compiling the resulting C++ code > >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

2017-07-10 Thread Sérgio Martins
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > Hi, > > I read Qt 5.9 is using a new garbage collector that is more predictable. > First good job and second I was wondering if there is any documentation on > that garbage collector in question. The documentation is probably this: https://co

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

2017-07-10 Thread Phil Bouchard
Phil Bouchard wrote: > > BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do In fact, is it me or it would seem that: - converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly - compiling the resulting C++ code Would be a more efficient alternative than all these JIT tools? My 2 cents, -Phil

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

2017-07-10 Thread Phil Bouchard
Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 9 de julho de 2017 21:13:33 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >> On 07/09/2017 10:22 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: >>> On 07/09/2017 06:35 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: I'm sure there is an equivalent in Qt but I'll need some pointers to speed things up. >>> >>> I thin

Re: [Development] How is Quick Controls 2 deployment meant to be ?

2017-07-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017 01:11:34 PDT Christian Kandeler wrote: > On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 14:30:08 +0200 > > Filippo Cucchetto wrote: > > * For the QtNetwork stuff you need to keep in mind that a lost of stuff > > works with URLs. For example you can specify and "http://.."; url for an >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

2017-07-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 9 de julho de 2017 21:13:33 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/09/2017 10:22 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > > On 07/09/2017 06:35 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > >> I'm sure there is an equivalent in > >> Qt but I'll need some pointers to speed things up. > > > > I think QAtomicInt is the perfect

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

2017-07-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 9 de julho de 2017 15:35:43 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > > You'll also need to disentangle it from Boost before it can be used in Qt. > > Move it to independent headers depending only on the C++98 standard > > library ( C++11 core language features are ok). > > The licenses are incompati

Re: [Development] How is Quick Controls 2 deployment meant to be ?

2017-07-10 Thread Christian Kandeler
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 14:30:08 +0200 Filippo Cucchetto wrote: > * For the QtNetwork stuff you need to keep in mind that a lost of stuff > works with URLs. For example you can specify and "http://.."; url for an > Image source. If i'm not wrong this implies that QtNetwork is a strong > dependency of