Re: [Development] Let's please drop MSVC 2013 for 5.10

2017-06-15 Thread Santtu Ahonen
>From: Shawn Rutledge >> On 15 Jun 2017, at 16:07, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> >> We have not one, not two, but THREE integration failures TODAY alone >> caused by that compiler failing to meet what we've come to expect from >> C++11. This is going to happen again and again. >> >> So I'm pleadin

[Development] CI problems

2017-06-15 Thread Tony Sarajärvi
Hi We're facing an unknown problem with contacting our RHEL 6.6 virtual machines. This stops all CI from progressing. We're investigating. -Tony ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/develo

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.10 pre-built bunaries

2017-06-15 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 16 Jun 2017, at 08:36, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Thursday, 15 June 2017 23:16:30 PDT Lars Knoll wrote: >> We’re one month away from the feature freeze, and in July half of the >> developers are on vacation. So there’s relatively little benefit from >> dropping 2013 now, as dev currently

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.10 pre-built bunaries

2017-06-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 23:16:30 PDT Lars Knoll wrote: > We’re one month away from the feature freeze, and in July half of the > developers are on vacation. So there’s relatively little benefit from > dropping 2013 now, as dev currently works with it. The difference is whether we have to put up

Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 pre-built bunaries

2017-06-15 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 16 Jun 2017, at 01:27, Sérgio Martins wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Jani Heikkinen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As a conclusion of subject: >> >> only change related to pre-built binaries for 5.10 (from Qt 5.9) is dropping >> 32 bit iOS. >> And from 5.11 -> we will drop MSVC2013 a

Re: [Development] Let's please drop MSVC 2013 for 5.10

2017-06-15 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> On 15 Jun 2017, at 16:07, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > We have not one, not two, but THREE integration failures TODAY alone caused > by > that compiler failing to meet what we've come to expect from C++11. This is > going to happen again and again. > > So I'm pleading again: can we drop it?

Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 pre-built bunaries

2017-06-15 Thread Sérgio Martins
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Hi, > > As a conclusion of subject: > > only change related to pre-built binaries for 5.10 (from Qt 5.9) is dropping > 32 bit iOS. > And from 5.11 -> we will drop MSVC2013 as well. Hi Jani, >From what I read in this thread I don't see t

[Development] Let's please drop MSVC 2013 for 5.10

2017-06-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
We have not one, not two, but THREE integration failures TODAY alone caused by that compiler failing to meet what we've come to expect from C++11. This is going to happen again and again. So I'm pleading again: can we drop it? What are the download numbers for 5.9.0? Issue 1 (12:19 GMT): https

Re: [Development] Examples and Demos in qtdoc

2017-06-15 Thread Mitch Curtis
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Bornemann > Sent: Thursday, 15 June 2017 9:54 AM > To: Pasi Keränen ; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Examples and Demos in qtdoc > > On 14/

Re: [Development] Examples and Demos in qtdoc

2017-06-15 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 14/06/2017 14:59, Pasi Keränen wrote: I’m not 100% sure about qtdoc as the repo though. But I can live with it if that is what is seen as best option by others. There are two kinds of examples: 1. Simple examples demonstrating the use of a certain technique. Those usually come with