On 8 June 2017 at 09:45, Lars Knoll wrote:
>>> And dropping GCC 4.7 would imply dropping support for QNX 6.
>>
>> I'll make the observation that we just released an LTS release that
>> will support QNX 6
>> until the next LTS comes out.
>
>
> Sure, it's still important that we all know about the p
> On 8 Jun 2017, at 08:37, Ville Voutilainen
> wrote:
>
> On 8 June 2017 at 09:23, Lars Knoll wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose raising the minimum version for GCC to 4.8.1, which is
>>> the
>>> first C++11 complete version, or higher. The reason for this is actually to
>>> drop GCC 4.7 and earli
On 8 June 2017 at 09:23, Lars Knoll wrote:
>> I'd like to propose raising the minimum version for GCC to 4.8.1, which is
>> the
>> first C++11 complete version, or higher. The reason for this is actually to
>> drop GCC 4.7 and earlier, which have a few bugs with their C++11 support.
>> GCC
>> 4.7
On 7 Jun 2017, at 22:09, Thiago Macieira
mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com>> wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 23:57:10 PDT Jani Heikkinen wrote:
Hi all,
There has been discussion ongoing about 5.10 supported platforms and CI
configurations. What we haven't agreed yet is Qt 5.10 pre-built binaries.
Hi,
Dropping ARMv7 and i386 iOS binaries should help in this.
Yours,
Tuukka
From: Development on
behalf of Marco Piccolino
Date: Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 8.37
To: "development@qt-project.org"
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 pre-built binaries
Hello,
Would you also consi
Hello,
Would you also consider creating a smaller macOS offline installer? Current
version with Android and iOS is at 3.5 Gb and has been reported to cause
persistent timeouts when downloaded on CI like Travis.
Is providing android and iOS as add-on installs an option?
Marco Piccolino
Il 07 giu 2
On quarta-feira, 7 de junho de 2017 13:30:30 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> FWIW, the first really C++11 complete version of GCC is 4.9, 4.8 still has a
> number of bugs that result in internal compiler errors, compilation errors,
> or runtime errors in some non-trivial but valid C++11 code. See f
07.06.2017, 23:09, "Thiago Macieira" :
> On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 23:57:10 PDT Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There has been discussion ongoing about 5.10 supported platforms and CI
>> configurations. What we haven't agreed yet is Qt 5.10 pre-built binaries. I
>> don't see big need to
On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 23:57:10 PDT Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There has been discussion ongoing about 5.10 supported platforms and CI
> configurations. What we haven't agreed yet is Qt 5.10 pre-built binaries. I
> don't see big need to change anything from 5.9 but there is still couple
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Lars Knoll wrote:
>
> Hi Jani,
>
>> On 7 Jun 2017, at 08:57, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There has been discussion ongoing about 5.10 supported platforms and CI
>> configurations. What we haven't agreed yet is Qt 5.10 pre-built binaries. I
>> do
Hi Jani,
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 08:57, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> There has been discussion ongoing about 5.10 supported platforms and CI
> configurations. What we haven't agreed yet is Qt 5.10 pre-built binaries. I
> don't see big need to change anything from 5.9 but there is still c
11 matches
Mail list logo
