Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 23 May 2017, at 07:26, Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 May 2017 00:48:53 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> Then we are right now concluding this kind of change should not be in that >> part of the QUIP. > > The QUIP gives an _algorithm_ to categorise SiCs, it's not a listing. There's > a list

Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread Marc Mutz
On Tuesday 23 May 2017 00:48:53 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Then we are right now concluding this kind of change should not be in that > part of the QUIP. The QUIP gives an _algorithm_ to categorise SiCs, it's not a listing. There's a list, yes. It's called _examples_. > if there's a chance of exi

Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 22 May 2017 14:05:46 PDT Marc Mutz wrote: > The point is that this completely foils the purpose of QUIP-6, namely to > have objective rules for (acceptable) SiCs. So we do _not_ have to deal > with this unproductive subjective nonsense all the time Then we are right now concluding this

Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread Marc Mutz
On 2017-05-22 21:54, Lars Knoll wrote: On 22 May 2017, at 20:14, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:14:59PM +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote: Am Montag, 22. Mai 2017, 12:04:10 CEST schrieb Marc Mutz: Hi, Removing top-level const from return types is a QUIP-6 Cat-A SiC, but was missing

Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread Lars Knoll
On 22 May 2017, at 20:14, André Pönitz mailto:apoen...@t-online.de>> wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:14:59PM +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote: Am Montag, 22. Mai 2017, 12:04:10 CEST schrieb Marc Mutz: Hi, Removing top-level const from return types is a QUIP-6 Cat-A SiC, but was missing from the e

Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread André Pönitz
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:14:59PM +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote: > Am Montag, 22. Mai 2017, 12:04:10 CEST schrieb Marc Mutz: > > Hi, > > > > Removing top-level const from return types is a QUIP-6 Cat-A SiC, but was > > missing from the examples. > > > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/195285 pr

Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread André Pönitz
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:04:10PM +0200, Marc Mutz wrote: > Hi, > > Removing top-level const from return types is a QUIP-6 Cat-A SiC, but was > missing from the examples. > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/195285 proposes to add it to the QUIP. I'd like to postpone this discussion until we

Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 22 May 2017 03:04:10 PDT Marc Mutz wrote: > Hi, > > Removing top-level const from return types is a QUIP-6 Cat-A SiC, but was > missing from the examples. > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/195285 proposes to add it to the QUIP. > > Precedence: E.g. https://codereview.qt-project.or

Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread Olivier Goffart
Am Montag, 22. Mai 2017, 12:04:10 CEST schrieb Marc Mutz: > Hi, > > Removing top-level const from return types is a QUIP-6 Cat-A SiC, but was > missing from the examples. > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/195285 proposes to add it to the QUIP. > > Precedence: E.g. https://codereview.qt-proje

[Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-22 Thread Marc Mutz
Hi, Removing top-level const from return types is a QUIP-6 Cat-A SiC, but was missing from the examples. https://codereview.qt-project.org/195285 proposes to add it to the QUIP. Precedence: E.g. https://codereview.qt-project.org/93161 Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz | Senior Software Engineer KDA

[Development] CI down for maintenance

2017-05-22 Thread Simon Hausmann
Hi, The CI is down again, but this time for maintenance (adding disk space). Based on the current progress it seems that it will take another ~3 hours for the RAID rebuild to complete. Simon ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org