Awesome. Thanks, Tony (and others who worked to get this resolved quickly)!
Yours,
Tuukka
From: Development on
behalf of Tony Sarajärvi
Date: Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 22.46
To: "development@qt-project.org"
Subject: Re: [Development] CI problems
(Apparently it was just my ow
(Apparently it was just my own inbox not being updated 😉)
It now looks like we have a running CI again!
I started Coin and everything seems to be running as normal. I’ll keep watching
it for a while longer and then resume work in the morning. Thanks for your
patience.
-Tony
From: Development
Hi
Seems my earlier 2 mails haven't reached you. I hope this one does.
We've suffered hardware malfunction today. Our CI environment began behaving
oddly aprox 20 hours ago and early this morning we noticed that not everything
was OK. To prevent data loss and further problems, we shut down the
Update:
Dell is investigating problems with the Compellent (our backend storage
system). We're seeing huge latencies over our fiber optics there and the system
can't be used atm. Their 24/7 crew is working on it as their P1.
-Tony
--
Update:
We're unsure why we a going at c
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 02:57:43 PDT Mårten Nordheim wrote:
> But to clarify, in your scenario
> "{}{}" % ("a", "b")
> would be "ab", correct?
That's what I would expect, yes.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
__
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 02:39:36 PDT Mårten Nordheim wrote:
> > Please consider, in terms of Qt API design (ease of use, surprise factor,
> > etc.) just what the following should do:
> >
> > QStringFormatter("%1 is {1}").arg("foo").subs("bar")
>
> Hm, hadn't thought that far ahead, thanks. I gue
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 03:01:08 PDT Sergio Martins wrote:
> On 2017-05-17 17:19, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Since I am unable to fulfill my duties as maintainer, I am stepping
> > down and
> > opening the way up for someone else.
>
> Hi Thiago,
>
> Do you have an overview on what's the current
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 03:58:19 PDT Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Isn't that a bit premature? Maybe someone could use these as inspiration.
> I'd like to see us (as in The Qt Project) be more flexible when it comes to
> ownership of patches - maybe someone feels inspired to take over some of
> the w
Update:
We're unsure why we a going at crawling speed on some parts of our infra. We
could be facing hardware issues since we have restarted almost everything we
have. Investigations are ongoing, and I can't give an ETA currently as to when
we come back online. We need to find the reason first.
Hello Thiago,
Thanks a lot for all the great work on QtDBus!
Cheers,
Frederik
On onsdag 17. mai 2017 09.19.13 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> With https://codereview.qt-project.org/194893 getting integrated, this
> signals my inability to keep QtDBus working for 4 minor releases in a row
> (5.6 th
Hi Thiago,
thanks for all the efforts you’ve been putting into it over the years.
> On 17 May 2017, at 18:19, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> With https://codereview.qt-project.org/194893 getting integrated, this
> signals
> my inability to keep QtDBus working for 4 minor releases in a row (5.6
On 2017-05-17 17:19, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Since I am unable to fulfill my duties as maintainer, I am stepping
down and
opening the way up for someone else.
Hi Thiago,
Do you have an overview on what's the current state of the module ? Just
so the next maintainer gets an idea of where to st
On 16.05.2017 19:14, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On {}{}: I think that's an acceptable shorthand, just like we have "%1 is %1"
today. A bracket without any digits has higher replacement precedence than
{0}:
"The {0} brown {} jumped over the {2} {3}" % ("fox", "quick", "dog", "lazy")
{} gets repla
On 16.05.2017 19:23, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 15 de maio de 2017 05:49:19 PDT Mårten Nordheim wrote:
- Note: To print a curly brace they have to be doubled (same
as in all of the above) ( "{{", "}}" )
Why do we need a double closing curly brace?
On 27 April 2017 at 17:57, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 April 2017 01:19:16 -03 Marc Mutz wrote:
>> On 2017-04-26 23:38, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>> > 26.04.2017, 08:04, "Marc Mutz" :
>> >> Users
>> >> that need a queue can use std::deque. If you don't iterate over it,
>> >> it's
>> >
15 matches
Mail list logo
