Re: [Development] New configuration system docs and FBX issues

2017-05-02 Thread Sean Harmer
Hi, On 01/05/2017 07:17, Sean Harmer wrote: Hi, is there any documentation for the new configuration system please? My specific issue is that I need a config test that uses different library names on each platform and I can't see how to achieve this. On windows I want the FBX config test in Qt

Re: [Development] MAINTAINERS: your action needed: Qt 5.9.0 change files

2017-05-02 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi, Well, that's true: We have created initial ones for maintainers to start with few previous releases. We can do the same for this time as well. Hoping already tomorrow br, Jani From: Simon Hausmann Sent: tiistaina 2. toukokuuta 2017 17.09 To: Jani Heikkinen ; development@qt-project.org Subj

Re: [Development] MAINTAINERS: your action needed: Qt 5.9.0 change files

2017-05-02 Thread Simon Hausmann
Hi, I'm a bit confused. The release team usually did the initial commit and maintainers edited the content. I'm fine with doing it myself, but I'm just wondering: Is there an intentional change in procedure? Simon From: Development on behalf of Jani Heikki

Re: [Development] DBus signals for (dlclose'd) style plugin causing crash during application exit?

2017-05-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 02:48:15 CDT René J. V. Bertin wrote: > I'm aware of the direct reason. Apparently you're sure enough that the CI > failure is without consequence to put the burden and responsibility of > incorporating the patch on end-users. That's what I mean with getting an > internal act

Re: [Development] DBus signals for (dlclose'd) style plugin causing crash during application exit?

2017-05-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 06:32:48 CDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 02:48:15 CDT René J. V. Bertin wrote: > > Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > > At the very least there should be alternative binaries (QtCore? QtDBus?) > > available for download with the patch applied to which you can p

Re: [Development] DBus signals for (dlclose'd) style plugin causing crash during application exit?

2017-05-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 02:48:15 CDT René J. V. Bertin wrote: > Thiago Macieira wrote: > > At the very least there should be alternative binaries (QtCore? QtDBus?) > available for download with the patch applied to which you can point people > who report related issues, and the patch itself should

[Development] MAINTAINERS: your action needed: Qt 5.9.0 change files

2017-05-02 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all Maintainers! Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.0' is now ongoing and it is time to start creating change files for Qt 5.9.0. Please do the initial ones as soon as possible. And if some important change is coming in after the initial ones are in change owner can (& have to) update the change f

Re: [Development] [docs] changing the way overloads are documented and presented

2017-05-02 Thread Martin Smith
>The text duplication is silly, and I have seen several places where >information was inadvertently added to only one of the overloads. We still need a way to tell qdoc how to provide information that applies to one overload, or to a subset of the \fn overloads in the list. martin __

[Development] Qt 5.9 beta3 available

2017-05-02 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all, Qt 5.9 beta3 is now available. Instructions how to get the release are here: https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer. Diff to second beta can be found as an attachment. Please test the release and report your effort via https://wiki.qt.io/Qt59_release_testing. I hop

[Development] [Announce] Qt 5.9 beta3 available

2017-05-02 Thread List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development
Hi all, Qt 5.9 beta3 is available. As earlier you can update it at the top of your Qt 5.9 beta(2) online installation or do clean installation by using qt online installer. Detailed instructions here: https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer br, Jani Heikkinen Release Manage

Re: [Development] New configuration system docs and FBX issues

2017-05-02 Thread Sean Harmer
Hi, On 02/05/2017 09:25, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 07:17:23AM +0100, Sean Harmer wrote: is there any documentation for the new configuration system please? the "documentation" is the vast amount of configure.json files which actually use it. Thanks, but that doesn't

Re: [Development] New configuration system docs and FBX issues

2017-05-02 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 07:17:23AM +0100, Sean Harmer wrote: > is there any documentation for the new configuration system please? > the "documentation" is the vast amount of configure.json files which actually use it. > My specific issue is that I need a config test that uses different > library

Re: [Development] [docs] changing the way overloads are documented and presented

2017-05-02 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 28/04/2017 09:35, Marc Mutz wrote: TL;DR: I propose to document overloaded functions with a single comment block, containing multiple \fn's and a common documentation text, to be rendered as one documentation block preceded by a listing of all the \fn's, instead of as individual functions.

Re: [Development] DBus signals for (dlclose'd) style plugin causing crash during application exit?

2017-05-02 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Thiago Macieira wrote: At the very least there should be alternative binaries (QtCore? QtDBus?) available for download with the patch applied to which you can point people who report related issues, and the patch itself should be provided with the sources (in the tarball or clearly listed on th

Re: [Development] New configuration system docs and FBX issues

2017-05-02 Thread Sean Harmer
Hi, On 01/05/2017 14:16, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Monday, 1 May 2017 03:17:23 -03 Sean Harmer wrote: Hi, is there any documentation for the new configuration system please? My specific issue is that I need a config test that uses different library names on each platform and I can't see how t

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-05-02 Thread Tuukka Turunen
Hi, While I do agree that having a platform in CI and supporting it for those who have purchased support are not 1:1, in case of dropping the 32-bit iOS from CI for Qt 5.10 it also means that this configuration should no longer be used and not be supported. I do not see much problems with that