Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi, Yes, MSVC 2017 is already supported in Qt 5.9 and we are trying to get pre-built binaries available before final release; let's see if we can make it happen br, jani From: Development on behalf of Wolfgang Baron Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 12:03

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> On 27 Apr 2017, at 16:59, Jake Petroules wrote: > > Anyways, iOS 11 will likely drop support for 32-bit applications entirely > (i.e. they will not launch because 32-bit system libs will be GONE). So I > agree we should stop shipping 32-bit slices in our binary distributions of Qt > for iOS

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Simon Hausmann
Hi, Exactly cutting down the time it takes for the CI to complete a build of all of Qt is one of the motivation factors. And note how in dev (and bus 5.10) we are spending extra time building for WatchOS and TvOS, so it would seem like a trade to me ;) Simon On 28. Apr 2017, at 08:28, Lars Kn

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Bogdan Vatra
Hi Jake, On joi, 27 aprilie 2017 15:00:58 EEST Jake Petroules wrote: > > On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:40 AM, BogDan Vatra wrote: > > > > For Android I'd like to support 64 bit platforms (arm and x86) > > > They are already supported. Feel free to compile Qt with the appropriate > -arch options. I kn

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Lars Knoll
On 27 Apr 2017, at 16:59, Jake Petroules mailto:jake.petrou...@qt.io>> wrote: On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:07 AM, Tuukka Turunen mailto:tuukka.turu...@qt.io>> wrote: Hi, Related to the Apple platforms, could we consider the following for Qt 5.10: - Drop the older iPhone support by removing ARMv7 f

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
Il 27/04/2017 23:37, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: > Because if you mean the former, it's already supported in 5.8. But not in 5.8.0. So, effectively, in no released 5.8 version. [grumbles] Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 18:03:32 -03 Wolfgang Baron wrote: > Thanks, I didn't see that and don't see a "msvc2017 64-bit" for "Qt 5.9 > Beta2" in the online installer, so I was afraid it would not be in the > release either. Good to hear it will be there for the release! There's no need. You can

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 17:50:08 -03 Wolfgang Baron wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any > version as soon as possible. Do you mean "support" as in "it works" or as in "it's tested in the CI". Because if you mean the former, it's already supp

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Wolfgang Baron
HI, Am 27.04.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Liang Qi: On 27 April 2017 at 22:50, Wolfgang Baron > wrote: Hi, I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any version as soon as possible. That will happen soon in 5.9, please follow up h

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Liang Qi
On 27 April 2017 at 22:50, Wolfgang Baron wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any > version as soon as possible. That will happen soon in 5.9, please follow up https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/191981/ and etc. Regards, Liang

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Wolfgang Baron
Hi, I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any version as soon as possible. Best regards, Wolfgang Baron ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 09:02:33 -03 Ville Voutilainen wrote: > That's because GCC 7 hasn't been released yet, but it will be soon, > and then it will be in almost every linux distro as a system > compiler before we ship Qt 5.10, so I think it would be quite wise to > have it in CI as soon as po

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Jake Petroules
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:40 AM, BogDan Vatra wrote: > > For Android I'd like to support 64 bit platforms (arm and x86) They are already supported. Feel free to compile Qt with the appropriate -arch options. Do you mean you want them in CI and want us to start shipping binaries for android amd6

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Jake Petroules
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:07 AM, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > > Hi, > > Related to the Apple platforms, could we consider the following for Qt 5.10: > - Drop the older iPhone support by removing ARMv7 from iOS > (http://dorianroy.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/iOS_Support_Matrix_v4.2.pdf) > -

Re: [Development] QList

2017-04-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 27 April 2017 01:19:16 -03 Marc Mutz wrote: > On 2017-04-26 23:38, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 26.04.2017, 08:04, "Marc Mutz" : > >> Users > >> that need a queue can use std::deque. If you don't iterate over it, > >> it's > >> a more than acceptable container. > > > > std::deque is

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread BogDan Vatra
For Android I'd like to support 64 bit platforms (arm and x86) BogDan. On April 27, 2017 12:29:08 PM GMT+03:00, Heikki Halmet wrote: >Hi, > > > >Below we have proposal for changes in supported platforms and >configurations from Qt 5.9 to 5.10. > >Please comment if the proposal is insufficient o

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread James McDonnell
The mkspecs are there. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/192579/ is needed to make them work (again). On 2017-04-27, 8:07 AM, "Development on behalf of Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)" wrote: >> Please refer to Qt 5.9 Supported platforms -> >>http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.9/supported-platform

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Tuukka Turunen
Correcting myself: Drop ARMv7 and ARMv7s support for iOS, meaning we only support 64bit iOS devices from Qt 5.10 onwards. Yours, Tuukka From: Development on behalf of Tuukka Turunen Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 4:07:48 PM To: Jake Petroules; Heikki Halmet;

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Tuukka Turunen
Hi, Related to the Apple platforms, could we consider the following for Qt 5.10: - Drop the older iPhone support by removing ARMv7 from iOS (http://dorianroy.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/iOS_Support_Matrix_v4.2.pdf) - Consider also dropping ARMv7s support, which would allow dropping i386

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)
> Please refer to Qt 5.9 Supported platforms -> > http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.9/supported-platforms.html That page has the following for QNX: “QNX 6.6.0, 7.0 (armv7le and x86)” As QNX 7.0 includes 64-bit support, are aarch64le and x86_64 supported on 5.9? If not, can they be added for 5.

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 27 April 2017 at 14:58, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > Giuseppe was asking on IRC for GCC 7 and Clang 4. Which are quite bleeding > edge for almost all distros at this point, I suppose; Arch recently got Clang > 4 but not GCC 7 yet. That's because GCC 7 hasn't been released yet, but it will be so

[Development] Qt World Summit 2017 Call for Presentations

2017-04-27 Thread Tero Kojo
Hello, This year Qt World Summit will be taking place in Berlin between 10th and 12th October. The venue will be the bcc, Berlin Congress Center. You can find more information on the event site at https://www.qtworldsummit.com/ The Call for Presentations has just been published on the Qt Blog:

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> On 27 Apr 2017, at 11:29, Heikki Halmet wrote: > > Hi, > > Below we have proposal for changes in supported platforms and configurations > from Qt 5.9 to 5.10. > Please comment if the proposal is insufficient or the changes are > unacceptable somehow. > > Please refer to Qt 5.9 Supported

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Jake Petroules
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:29 AM, Heikki Halmet wrote: > > Hi, > > Below we have proposal for changes in supported platforms and configurations > from Qt 5.9 to 5.10. > Please comment if the proposal is insufficient or the changes are > unacceptable somehow. > > Please refer to Qt 5.9 Support

[Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.9' to '5.9.0' started

2017-04-27 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi, We have soft branched '5.9.0' from '5.9'. Please start using '5.9.0' for new changes targeted to Qt 5.9.0 release. There should be enough time to finalize ongoing changes in '5.9'; final downmerge will happen Thursday 4th May. br, Jani ___ Develo

[Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes

2017-04-27 Thread Heikki Halmet
Hi, Below we have proposal for changes in supported platforms and configurations from Qt 5.9 to 5.10. Please comment if the proposal is insufficient or the changes are unacceptable somehow. Please refer to Qt 5.9 Supported platforms -> http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.9/supported-platform