Hi,
To me this appears to be comparing the questions that new learning programmers
have with questions of seasoned C++ programmers. I understand that we should
cater both with Qt, but the topic at this point of the thread is the former
group, not the latter.
Simon
> On 31. Mar 2017, at 08:41,
On Thursday 30 March 2017 22:32:35 Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 March 2017 20:11:58 Marc Mutz wrote:
> > I would really, really
> > like to know why QVector is easier to use? Because it has indexOf()?
> > Seriously, now?
>
> Because it has _lots_ of easy to use member functions, and an
On Wednesday 29 March 2017 20:11:58 Marc Mutz wrote:
> I would really, really
> like to know why QVector is easier to use? Because it has indexOf()?
> Seriously, now?
Because it has _lots_ of easy to use member functions, and another kind of
iterator that is also easier to use for some, and goo
On quinta-feira, 30 de março de 2017 04:14:53 PDT Marc Mutz wrote:
>* Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 (compiler version 19.0)
This was 18.0
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
On quinta-feira, 30 de março de 2017 02:40:53 PDT Marc Mutz wrote:
> Ok, not 100% transparent in all cases, then. But a symbol comparison like we
> do before a release will highlight this.
I'm assuming you're talking here about the library whose binary compatibility
gets broken: we do a header di
On 2017-03-29 18:33, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 30.03.2017, 00:17, "Philippe" :
>> And being able to use a QVector with O(1) by-value assigment, thanks to
>> COW, make it easy to use QVectors "as primitive types", with no
>> reasonning effort.
>
> With move semantics you can achieve this without
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:14:31PM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> Il 30/03/2017 11:43, Ville Voutilainen ha scritto:
> > On 30 March 2017 at 12:21, Marc Mutz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Can we drop GCC 4.7 from the list of supported compilers for 5.10? It has a
> >> bug that makes writing constex
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 4.3 Beta!
https://blog.qt.io/blog/2017/03/30/qt-creator-4-3-beta-released/
--
Eike Ziller
Principal Software Engineer
The Qt Company GmbH
Rudower Chaussee 13
D-12489 Berlin
eike.zil...@qt.io
http://qt.io
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Vareli
On Thursday 30 March 2017 11:54:42 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 11:21:35 CEST Marc Mutz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can we drop GCC 4.7 from the list of supported compilers for 5.10? It has
> > a bug that makes writing constexpr classes like QSizePolicy, QUuid, ...
> > very ann
Il 30/03/2017 11:43, Ville Voutilainen ha scritto:
> On 30 March 2017 at 12:21, Marc Mutz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can we drop GCC 4.7 from the list of supported compilers for 5.10? It has a
>> bug that makes writing constexpr classes like QSizePolicy, QUuid, ... very
>> annoying:
>> https://gcc.gnu.or
On Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 11:21:35 CEST Marc Mutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we drop GCC 4.7 from the list of supported compilers for 5.10? It has a
> bug that makes writing constexpr classes like QSizePolicy, QUuid, ... very
> annoying:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
>
> If we
On 30 March 2017 at 12:21, Marc Mutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we drop GCC 4.7 from the list of supported compilers for 5.10? It has a
> bug that makes writing constexpr classes like QSizePolicy, QUuid, ... very
> annoying:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
Yes please. Is there some
On Thursday 30 March 2017 11:31:11 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 11:08:45 CEST Marc Mutz wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 March 2017 08:41:51 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > On Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 08:32:24 CEST Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 30 March 2017 08:18:52 Olivier
On Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 11:08:45 CEST Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Thursday 30 March 2017 08:41:51 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 08:32:24 CEST Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > On Thursday 30 March 2017 08:18:52 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > > On Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 07:20:11 CEST
Hi,
Can we drop GCC 4.7 from the list of supported compilers for 5.10? It has a
bug that makes writing constexpr classes like QSizePolicy, QUuid, ... very
annoying:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
If we can drop MSVC 2013, too, we can start to use char16_t unconditionlly,
wh
On Thursday 30 March 2017 08:41:51 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 08:32:24 CEST Marc Mutz wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 March 2017 08:18:52 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > On Donnerstag, 30. März 2017 07:20:11 CEST Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 29 March 2017 22:12:30 Thiago
16 matches
Mail list logo