01.03.2017, 13:28, "Denis Shienkov" :
> Hi all,
>
> I have use Qt 5.8, and I want to send to the UDP socket many datagrams
> (e.g. 1 datagrams, each datagram have 1000 bytes size).
Totally unrelated to your main issue, but make sure you are using connected UDP
socket when sending many datagr
Hi Thiago,
> QAbstractSocket::waitForBytesWritten ... This isn't needed and isn't
useful.
> QUdpSocket is unbuffered, so the bytesWritten() signal is not useful.
> You don't get to poll(). See above.
Goood news! :)
So, should I create an own wrapper (QIODevice) for the UDP socket? Or there
is a
Em quarta-feira, 1 de março de 2017, às 02:27:54 PST, Denis Shienkov escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I have use Qt 5.8, and I want to send to the UDP socket many datagrams
> (e.g. 1 datagrams, each datagram have 1000 bytes size).
>
> I use following code:
>
> int busyCounter = 0;
> f
Em quarta-feira, 1 de março de 2017, às 04:38:47 PST, Marc Mutz escreveu:
> > This also implies that bug fixes should now get pushed to the 5.9 branch
> > and we should close the 5.8 branch soon.
>
> I disagree. Even if you cannot produce releases from 5.8 anymore, that's our
> stable branch. 5.9
> -Original Message-
> [...]
> > This also implies that bug fixes should now get pushed to the 5.9
> > branch and we should close the 5.8 branch soon.
>
> I disagree. Even if you cannot produce releases from 5.8 anymore, that's our
> stable branch. 5.9 isn't stable, yet. If you release 5.9
> So let me play the devil's advocate: 5.9.1 also will be canceled for
> similar arbitrary reasons like vacation plans.
or the universe might end for no readily apparent reason.
There is no reason to expect either will happen, though.
> Guys, by not delivering bugfix releases for arbitrary reason
Am 18.02.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 11:49:28 PST Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
18.02.2017, 22:13, "Thiago Macieira" :
On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 06:36:07 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote:
Keeping 5.9.0 on schedule even while 5.8.0 blows past its pla
Am 01.03.17 um 13:38 schrieb Marc Mutz:
> On Wednesday 01 March 2017 13:13:17 Lars Knoll wrote:
>>> Let’s conclude this topic now by moving on towards 5.9 as Tuukka
>>> proposed. After some thinking I also agree that this is the best course
>>> of action from where we are right now.
>> This also im
On Wednesday 01 March 2017 13:13:17 Lars Knoll wrote:
> > Let’s conclude this topic now by moving on towards 5.9 as Tuukka
> > proposed. After some thinking I also agree that this is the best course
> > of action from where we are right now.
>
> This also implies that bug fixes should now get push
> On 01 Mar 2017, at 08:58, Lars Knoll wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for answering only now to this thread, I was on vacation last week.
>
> Let’s conclude this topic now by moving on towards 5.9 as Tuukka proposed.
> After some thinking I also agree that this is the best course of action from
>
Hi
We have scheduled a maintenance break for the CI next weekend. This will cause
the CI to be totally offline at least during Sat and could extend over Sun as
well.
We've planned to do extensive wipe or cleanup to local stored distro images. We
have accumulated garbage over the years and the
Hi all,
I have use Qt 5.8, and I want to send to the UDP socket many datagrams
(e.g. 1 datagrams, each datagram have 1000 bytes size).
I use following code:
int busyCounter = 0;
for(;;) {
...
const QNetworkDatagram datagram(data, m_remoteAddress,
Proto
12 matches
Mail list logo
