On 7 February 2017 at 23:18, Edward Welbourne wrote:
[...]
>
> Sze Howe Koh (7 February 2017 04:35) replied:
>> See http://wiki.qt.io/Branch_Guidelines (Note: Qt module repositories
>> don't have a "master" branch)
>>
>> Right now, the branches that accept documentation fixes are:
>>
>> * 5.8 (sta
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> It needs to work, because we can't ship all plugins. It does not need to be
> exactly the same way that it was before, but there needs to be a way.
>
> Seeing there's a bug report already, let's discuss ther on how to solve this.
Agreed and agreed.
R.
__
Em terça-feira, 7 de fevereiro de 2017, às 20:06:38 PST, Konstantin Tokarev
escreveu:
> 07.02.2017, 20:03, "Vincas Dargis" :
> > 2017.02.06 18:38, Thiago Macieira rašė:
> >> Yes, but it's very hard to measure. I do agree in shrinking our code
> >> however much we can (which is why I'd like to sup
Em terça-feira, 7 de fevereiro de 2017, às 17:25:57 PST, René J.V. Bertin
escreveu:
> This approach is broken in Qt 5.8.0; is it still possible to build these
> plugins separately? Would this work by calling qmake in qtbase/src/sql for
> instance, with the appropriate arguments?
It needs to work,
On Tuesday February 07 2017 17:35:37 Samuel Gaist wrote:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-58372
Indeed, thanks. Removing the QMAKE_USE+=psql line also worked here (plus moving
.qmake.conf into the psql directory).
R.
___
Development mailing lis
07.02.2017, 20:03, "Vincas Dargis" :
> 2017.02.06 18:38, Thiago Macieira rašė:
>> Yes, but it's very hard to measure. I do agree in shrinking our code however
>> much we can (which is why I'd like to suppress the unwind tables
>> completely).
>
> Sorry for off-topic, but I wonder, have anyone
2017.02.06 18:38, Thiago Macieira rašė:
Yes, but it's very hard to measure. I do agree in shrinking our code however
much we can (which is why I'd like to suppress the unwind tables completely).
Sorry for off-topic, but I wonder, have anyone measured how Qt modules
sizes differs with and with
> On 7 Feb 2017, at 17:25, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> MacPorts has always shipped the Qt sql plugins as separate packages, so the
> main (QtBase) component could be built without unnecessary libraries
> installed. That is, qtbase is configured with -no-sql-$driver
>
> This was im
Hello,
MacPorts has always shipped the Qt sql plugins as separate packages, so the
main (QtBase) component could be built without unnecessary libraries installed.
That is, qtbase is configured with -no-sql-$driver
This was implemented quite simply: to build say the PostGresql plugin we'd
unpac
On terça-feira, 7 de fevereiro de 2017 12:03:47 PST Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Lars Knoll (7 February 2017 12:45) wrote:
> > The way we have been drawing our governance model as a pyramid had
> > always implied this for me. But I can see that it’s not explicitly
> > mentioned in the wiki page.
>
>
> On 07 Feb 2017, at 13:03, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> Lars Knoll (7 February 2017 12:45) wrote:
>> The way we have been drawing our governance model as a pyramid had
>> always implied this for me. But I can see that it’s not explicitly
>> mentioned in the wiki page.
>
> Indeed, the "Becoming
Lars Knoll (7 February 2017 12:45) wrote:
> The way we have been drawing our governance model as a pyramid had
> always implied this for me. But I can see that it’s not explicitly
> mentioned in the wiki page.
Indeed, the "Becoming a Maintainer" section did in fact only permit us
to nominate exist
> On 07 Feb 2017, at 11:29, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> Sergio Martins (6 February 2017 17:11) quoted
>> https://wiki.qt.io/The_Qt_Governance_Model kind of implies you can't
>> be a maintainer if you're not an approver.
>> "How to become a Maintainer: An Approver who (...), may be nomiated
>> (.
Sergio Martins (6 February 2017 17:11) quoted
> https://wiki.qt.io/The_Qt_Governance_Model kind of implies you can't
> be a maintainer if you're not an approver.
> "How to become a Maintainer: An Approver who (...), may be nomiated
> (...)"
However, the next paragraph adds "A Maintainer may also n
On 7 February 2017 at 08:39, Ch'Gans wrote:
>> It's been a while that I notice some typos here and there in Qt5
>> documentation (mainly qtbase), and i decided that i would start
>> correcting them in the source code.
Thank you :-)
[snip]
>> documentation looks always nicer without typos.
Indee
On 06 Feb 2017, at 19:27, Thiago Macieira
mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com>> wrote:
On segunda-feira, 6 de fevereiro de 2017 18:39:19 PST Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:54:53PM +, Alexander Blasche wrote:
There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies appro
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago
> Macieira
> Sent: maanantaina 6. helmikuuta 2017 20.27
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Nominate Mike Krus as approver
>
> On seg
17 matches
Mail list logo
