On 7 February 2017 at 08:39, Ch'Gans wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> It's been a while that I notice some typos here and there in Qt5
> documentation (mainly qtbase), and i decided that i would start
> correcting them in the source code.
> Most of them are really straight forward, eg. in QGraphicsView::s
Hi there,
It's been a while that I notice some typos here and there in Qt5
documentation (mainly qtbase), and i decided that i would start
correcting them in the source code.
Most of them are really straight forward, eg. in QGraphicsView::setTransform:
"To simplify interation with items using a tr
On segunda-feira, 6 de fevereiro de 2017 18:39:19 PST Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:54:53PM +, Alexander Blasche wrote:
> > >There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver, so
> > >could somebody do the honours and grant Mike the rights please? Th
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:54:53PM +, Alexander Blasche wrote:
> >There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver, so
> >could
> >somebody do the honours and grant Mike the rights please? The necessary
> >period
> >has long since passed.
>
> I am sorry but being the main
+1 for Mike Krus as Approver.
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Sergio Martins wrote:
>
> On 2017-02-06 14:54, Alex Blasche wrote:
>>> There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver, so
>>> could
>>> somebody do the honours and grant Mike the rights please? The necessary
>>>
On segunda-feira, 6 de fevereiro de 2017 07:34:35 PST Alex Blasche wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would help to actually state the rules the bot is following.
>
> This case below is an assumption since you don't really name the rules and I
> am interpreting in between your lines:
>
> How do I stage a chang
On segunda-feira, 6 de fevereiro de 2017 10:33:52 PST Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Thiago Macieira (3 February 2017 17:45)
>
> > It's irrelevant when the function called is one of ours, in a library
> > of ours that got compiled with -fno-exceptions. It'll never
> > throw. Even the few libraries we c
Hi all,
QtWebKit Technology Preview 5 is out.
Highlights of these release are:
* WebGL, accelerated compositing and accelerated 2D canvas are supported now.
Accelerated compositing is disabled by default for now, it is known to cause
minor artifacts on some sites.
* MinGW compiler is now full
On 2017-02-06 14:54, Alex Blasche wrote:
There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver,
so could
somebody do the honours and grant Mike the rights please? The
necessary period
has long since passed.
I am sorry but being the maintainer does not imply approver rights.
h
On Monday 06 February 2017 14:54:53 Alex Blasche wrote:
> >There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver, so
> >could somebody do the honours and grant Mike the rights please? The
> >necessary period has long since passed.
>
> I am sorry but being the maintainer does not imp
On Monday, February 6, 2017 1:29:18 PM CET Bogdan Vatra wrote:
> On luni, 6 februarie 2017 12:26:03 EET Sean Harmer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to nominate Mike Krus as an approver. Mike contributed support
> > for
> > Qt on tvOS along with the refactoring that went in as part of this. Mike
>
>There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver, so could
>somebody do the honours and grant Mike the rights please? The necessary period
>has long since passed.
I am sorry but being the maintainer does not imply approver rights. At most it
implies approver rights for the c
Hi,
in fact, I've just been reminded we already proposed and voted for Mike as
maintainer of the tvOS system last year:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-August/026903.html
There were no objections and maintainer of a module implies approver, so could
somebody do the honou
On luni, 6 februarie 2017 12:26:03 EET Sean Harmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to nominate Mike Krus as an approver. Mike contributed support for
> Qt on tvOS along with the refactoring that went in as part of this. Mike
> has done a lot of work within Qt 3D too.
>
> Disclaimer: Mike is a colleague
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Mike Krus as an approver. Mike contributed support for Qt
on tvOS along with the refactoring that went in as part of this. Mike has done
a lot of work within Qt 3D too.
Disclaimer: Mike is a colleague at KDAB.
Cheers,
Sean
--
Dr Sean Harmer | sean.har...@kdab.com | M
Hi Oswald,
> look at the changes' review comments?
Sorry for the noise. Now I got it :)
Thanks, André
Am 06.02.2017 um 10:59 schrieb Oswald Buddenhagen:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:24:33AM +0100, André Hartmann wrote:
and what about changes already uploaded to Gerrit, containing a
cherry-pick
>>> [followed by exception handling code irrelevant for us]
>>
>> I disagree. The exception code is not irrelevant for our users (and
>> not for us, either, e.g. in QtCore).
Thiago Macieira (3 February 2017 17:45)
> It's irrelevant when the function called is one of ours, in a library
> of ours th
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 12:56:24PM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 04.02.2017, 01:23, "Oswald Buddenhagen" :
> > note that there is an exception to the policy as well: the qt5 super
> > repo continues to operate in forward-merge mode also for the LTS branch.
> > you probably don't care unless yo
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:24:33AM +0100, André Hartmann wrote:
> and what about changes already uploaded to Gerrit, containing a
> cherry-pick line?
>
look at the changes' review comments?
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://
04.02.2017, 01:23, "Oswald Buddenhagen" :
> moin,
>
> we finally managed to add a cherry-pick validator to the sanity bot, so
> i dared to open the 5.6 branch for staging again.
>
> caveat: patchsets created before the final forward merge got a positive
> review while they aren't cherry-picks. i
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:34:35AM +, Alexander Blasche wrote:
> How do I stage a change that is not a cherry-pick? Yes, they do exist
> and I can name a few cases where this makes sense especially since we
> are talking about 3 minor releases of Qt in between.
>
you override the bot, clearly
Hi,
and what about changes already uploaded to Gerrit, containing a
cherry-pick line?
They cannot be uploaded again without changing at least the commit
message. What should happen there?
Best regards,
André
Am 06.02.2017 um 08:34 schrieb Alex Blasche:
Hi,
It would help to actually state
22 matches
Mail list logo
