On Friday 03 February 2017 08:49:24 Marc Mutz wrote:
> Results on GCC 6.1.1, compiled with the same settings as our tests:
Better-formatted version posted in comment to
https://codereview.qt-project.org/143763
--
Marc Mutz | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group
On Friday 03 February 2017 08:00:16 Philippe wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 23:52:26 +0100
>
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 31 January 2017 15:24:18 Philippe wrote:
> > >> I just want to highlight, that QStringView is not COW friendly. AFAIK.
> >
> > That alone makes it actually a pessimiz
> What are the advantages of NUT/ORM over existing, proven technologies like
> ODB?
Odb is other than QtSql module, but Nut use Qt so is familiar to Qt developers.
Odb has own compiler for pre-compiler declaratives and is hard to use
for beginners. But Nut use macro hack and no need another tool fo
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 23:52:26 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 January 2017 15:24:18 Philippe wrote:
> >> I just want to highlight, that QStringView is not COW friendly. AFAIK.
>
> That alone makes it actually a pessimization.
This is why Thiago commented with:
>But we still have to
On Thursday 02 February 2017 23:52:26 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > But that's why we'll have QStringView Level 3, where only the QStringView
> > QLabel::setText() overload will be compiled in. Then, we compile Qt with
> > either level and check the respective performance of the result. I'll
> > wager th
Hamed Masafi wrote:
> This project currently... :
> - has code name 'Nut' and suggested name is ORM. But it may have any
> other name.
ORM is way too generic a name. It needs to be called at least QORM or QtORM
or ORM-Qt or something, if you cannot think of a more original name. (But
the name
> On Tuesday 31 January 2017 15:24:18 Philippe wrote:
>> I just want to highlight, that QStringView is not COW friendly. AFAIK.
That alone makes it actually a pessimization.
Marc Mutz wrote:
> Q6String will likely have the small-string optimisation, so short strings
> aren't actually COWed, but d
Alexander Volkov wrote:
> Currently it reads into QString as in a buffer and if you need to copy
> the buffer, then you
> have to manually make a deep copy of it:
> QTextStream ts(...);
> QString line;
> line.reserve(1024);
> QStringList found;
> while (ts.readLineInto(&lin
On Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2017 20:38:00 CET Hamed Masafi wrote:
> Project Name: Nut (currently renamed to ORM)
>
> Description: ORM is a project aimed to help users working with databases.
> Developer will write his/her own classes and ORM will generates database
> schema and corresponding tables.
Project Name: Nut (currently renamed to ORM)
Description: ORM is a project aimed to help users working with databases.
Developer will write his/her own classes and ORM will generates database
schema and corresponding tables. ORM can generate database migration code
(create, drop and alter table an
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:12:37PM +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Montag, 30. Januar 2017 08:32:50 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On segunda-feira, 30 de janeiro de 2017 14:43:22 PST Konstantin Tokarev
> wrote:
> > > What about Intel? (IIRC they use EDG frontend, aren't they?)
> >
> > icc on
On quinta-feira, 2 de fevereiro de 2017 16:12:37 PST Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Montag, 30. Januar 2017 08:32:50 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On segunda-feira, 30 de janeiro de 2017 14:43:22 PST Konstantin Tokarev
>
> wrote:
> > > What about Intel? (IIRC they use EDG frontend, aren't they?)
> >
On Montag, 30. Januar 2017 08:32:50 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 30 de janeiro de 2017 14:43:22 PST Konstantin Tokarev
wrote:
> > What about Intel? (IIRC they use EDG frontend, aren't they?)
>
> icc on Mac and Windows operates like GCC and Clang.
>
> I'll check icl.exe on Windo
Jani Heikkinen reported an action item of the release team meeting:
>>> * API review to be started immediately after final downmerge.
I replied with (January 31, 2017 6:52 PM):
>> Let me know as soon as that down-merge is done.
>> Speaking of API review, review of
>> https://codereview.qt-proje
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 05:28:23AM +, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>> We have now soft branched '5.9' from 'dev'. Target is to have final
>> downmerge from 'dev' to '5.9' and Qt 5.9 Feature Freeze 1st of
>> February.
>>
>> Please finalize ongoing changes in 'dev' and start using '5.9' for
>> new chang
15 matches
Mail list logo
