Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemviews in qtdeclarative

2017-01-16 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> On 14 Jan 2017, at 13:37, J-P Nurmi wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to request a WIP branch for the Qt Quick item views. There are > plenty of items on the roadmap/wishlist: +1 from me as well. I think the back pressure about creating branches is really holding us back - you should be able to

Re: [Development] Calendar Systems proposal

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Thursday 15 December 2016, Soroush Rabiei wrote: > Currently there is no support of any calendar system other than Gregorian. > Gregorian calendar is widely used in western countries. However most > countries > in Middle-east, Asia and Africa use other calendar systems. Unfortunately > there > i

Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemviews in qtdeclarative

2017-01-16 Thread J-P Nurmi
> On 16 Jan 2017, at 16:24, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:37:06PM +, J-P Nurmi wrote: >> Early feedback from the CI system would be invaluable. >> > note that nowadays you can explicitly schedule CI runs on arbitrary > pending changes. > of course, that's not the o

Re: [Development] Calendar Systems proposal

2017-01-16 Thread Jake Petroules
Eddy, "draft" does not do what you think it does. This is why no one can see the change. Please remove "draft" status and add "WIP: " at the front of the commit message instead so we can all take a look. Thanks, > On Jan 16, 2017, at 5:07 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote: > > On Sunday 15 January

Re: [Development] invokeMethod() with function pointers

2017-01-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2017 19:23:07 PST Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > The QTimer solution could work, but you cannot add parameters without using > std::bind. Use a lambda. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center __

Re: [Development] invokeMethod() with function pointers

2017-01-16 Thread Benjamin TERRIER
2017-01-16 10:34 GMT+01:00 Olivier Goffart : > On Samstag, 14. Januar 2017 17:28:01 CET Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm trying to contribute by making QMetaObject::invokeMethod() take > function > > pointers instead of function names. > > > > I've come up with something that w

Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemviews in qtdeclarative

2017-01-16 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:37:06PM +, J-P Nurmi wrote: > Early feedback from the CI system would be invaluable. > note that nowadays you can explicitly schedule CI runs on arbitrary pending changes. of course, that's not the only _possible_ reason for wanting a branch, but if it's the only _ac

Re: [Development] Switch Qt Remote Objects to a Tech Preview for Qt 5.9

2017-01-16 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 05:07:30PM +, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote: > My interpretation was that Lars was looking for differences from a Qt user > perspective, and I think my reply was accurate from that perspective. I > would say you are looking at it from the s/w implementation perspectiv

Re: [Development] Calendar Systems proposal

2017-01-16 Thread Edward Welbourne
On Sunday 15 January 2017 14:39:49 Soroush Rabiei wrote: >> Just submitted first change set: >> >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/182341/ Frédéric Marchal replied: > I'm seeing an error: "The page you requested was not found, or you do > not have permission to view this page." I've just ad

Re: [Development] Branch request: wip/itemviews in qtdeclarative

2017-01-16 Thread Edward Welbourne
Robin Burchell > I have a longer mental list of things that concern/bother me with > current model/views (some of which we've already discussed), maybe I > should try write that up in some form, if you think it might find it > helpful, but as I don't know how much time I'll be able to dedicate to >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 feature freeze

2017-01-16 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Kindly reminder: there is a bit more than two weeks left before FF is in effect. So please finalize new features now. Is there new submolules coming in for 5.9? If there is those should be added in qt5.git now... br, Jani From: Jani Heikkinen Sent: Mond

Re: [Development] invokeMethod() with function pointers

2017-01-16 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Montag, 16. Januar 2017 12:57:01 CET Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 16.01.2017, 12:34, "Olivier Goffart" : > > On Samstag, 14. Januar 2017 17:28:01 CET Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I'm trying to contribute by making QMetaObject::invokeMethod() take > >> function pointers i

Re: [Development] invokeMethod() with function pointers

2017-01-16 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
16.01.2017, 12:34, "Olivier Goffart" : > On Samstag, 14. Januar 2017 17:28:01 CET Benjamin TERRIER wrote: >>  Hi everyone, >> >>  I'm trying to contribute by making QMetaObject::invokeMethod() take function >>  pointers instead of function names. >> >>  I've come up with something that works by l

Re: [Development] invokeMethod() with function pointers

2017-01-16 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Samstag, 14. Januar 2017 17:28:01 CET Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm trying to contribute by making QMetaObject::invokeMethod() take function > pointers instead of function names. > > I've come up with something that works by looking at the code of > QMetaObject::invokeMethod,

Re: [Development] Calendar Systems proposal

2017-01-16 Thread Frédéric Marchal
On Sunday 15 January 2017 14:39:49 Soroush Rabiei wrote: > Just submitted first change set: > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/182341/ I'm seeing an error: "The page you requested was not found, or you do not have permission to view this page." Frederic _