Em terça-feira, 6 de dezembro de 2016, às 00:00:20 PST, Gunnar Roth escreveu:
> > It is, but it's possible that the qt5 link to qtbase is outdated due to
> > having failed to integrate. You need to update qtbase to the 5.8.0
> > branch, even past what qt5 requires of you.
>
> i did git checkout 5.
> Am 05.12.2016 um 20:07 schrieb Thiago Macieira :
>
> Em segunda-feira, 5 de dezembro de 2016, às 15:42:25 PST, Gunnar Roth
> escreveu:
>> Hello,
>> My try to build qt 5.8.0 from git using vs2017 rc (CL 19.10.24629) failed
>> already when building configure. (commit
>> 2c27ccd1c9a821edd071cae63
Em segunda-feira, 5 de dezembro de 2016, às 15:46:43 PST, Lisandro Damián
Nicanor Pérez Meyer escreveu:
> Hi! Some time ago Thiago made possible to tag private symbols as such, at
> least on Linux. We have found some more symbols that need this tag
> (QTBUG-57060) and I'm tracking a possible new s
Em segunda-feira, 5 de dezembro de 2016, às 15:42:25 PST, Gunnar Roth
escreveu:
> Hello,
> My try to build qt 5.8.0 from git using vs2017 rc (CL 19.10.24629) failed
> already when building configure. (commit
> 2c27ccd1c9a821edd071cae6336ecb2066ce2ab7) the qt 5.8 beta did work. Using
> CL 19.00.24
Hi! Some time ago Thiago made possible to tag private symbols as such, at
least on Linux. We have found some more symbols that need this tag
(QTBUG-57060) and I'm tracking a possible new set on fcitx-qt5.
I would love to try and patch this but I definitely can't remember what was
the tag that o
On mandag 5. desember 2016 13.23.45 CET Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed Konstantin Tokarev who has been doing most of the
> development, and practical maintenance of QtWebKit after it moved into
> "removed" state is still missing reviewer status. I suggest we correct
> th
Ok thank you Friedeman,
so
$ cd qt5
$ perl init-repository
$ git checkout 5.8.0
$ git submodule update
is not the correct way to get latest 5.8.0 from git?
But what is the correct way then?
Regards,
Gunnar Roth
Gesendet: Montag, 05. Dezember 2016 um 16:35 Uhr
Von: "Fried
Hi,
>My try to build qt 5.8.0 from git using vs2017 rc (CL 19.10.24629)
failed already when building configure. (commit
2c27ccd1c9a821edd071cae6336ecb2066ce2ab7)
>the qt 5.8 beta did work. Using CL 19.00.24213.1 (vs2015 upd3 + kb)
also works.
>does anyone have the same problem? Probably const
Hello,
My try to build qt 5.8.0 from git using vs2017 rc (CL 19.10.24629) failed already when building configure. (commit 2c27ccd1c9a821edd071cae6336ecb2066ce2ab7)
the qt 5.8 beta did work. Using CL 19.00.24213.1 (vs2015 upd3 + kb) also works.
does anyone have the same problem? Probably constex
Congratulations to Antti Määttä. Approver rights have been set.
--
Alex
From: Development
on behalf of Pasi Keränen
Sent: Tuesday, 15 November 2016 6:16:06 AM
To: Sean Harmer; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Antti Määtt
> On 5 Dec 2016, at 13:23, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed Konstantin Tokarev who has been doing most of the development,
> and practical maintenance of QtWebKit after it moved into "removed" state is
> still missing reviewer status. I suggest we correct this.
+1!
On Sunday, December 4, 2016 10:28:16 PM CET Peter Hartmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after Google announced their continuous fuzzing approach some days ago
> (see [1]), I tried to make Qt work with it and the fuzzing testcases I
> have written the last weeks ([2]).
>
> If people agree, we could try goi
On 2016-12-05 12:23, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
Hi all,
I just noticed Konstantin Tokarev who has been doing most of the
development,
and practical maintenance of QtWebKit after it moved into "removed"
state is
still missing reviewer status. I suggest we correct this.
+1
Regards,
--
Sér
On Monday, December 5, 2016 1:23:45 PM CET Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed Konstantin Tokarev who has been doing most of the
> development, and practical maintenance of QtWebKit after it moved into
> "removed" state is still missing reviewer status. I suggest we correct
>
+1 from me as well.
Cheers,
Lars
From: Development on
behalf of Simon Hausmann
Date: Monday, 5 December 2016 at 13:50
To: Allan Sandfeld Jensen , Qt development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Konstantin Tokarev for Approver status
+1
Simon
+1
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 1:23:45 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating Konstantin Tokarev for Approver status
Hi all,
I just noticed Konstantin Tokarev who has
Hi all,
I just noticed Konstantin Tokarev who has been doing most of the development,
and practical maintenance of QtWebKit after it moved into "removed" state is
still missing reviewer status. I suggest we correct this.
Besides his work in the official qtwebkit branch, he also doing the QtWebK
17 matches
Mail list logo
