On 2016-11-11 10:13, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> I'd like to establish some kind of convention for naming
> path/directory-related environment variables in Qt, with the hope
> that it could be set in stone with e.g. one of these newfangled
> QUIPs. [...] So, can we all agree on using "PATH" when naming
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Christian Kandeler
> Sent: Friday, 11 November 2016 4:42 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Naming of path/directory-related environment
> va
Mitch Curtis gave examples and proposed a convention:
> I'd like to establish some kind of convention for naming
> path/directory-related environment variables in Qt, with the hope that
> it could be set in stone with e.g. one of these newfangled QUIPs.
>
> Pelagicore (via Gordan) kindly contribute
On 11/11/2016 04:13 PM, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> I'd like to establish some kind of convention for naming
> path/directory-related environment variables in Qt, with the hope that it
> could be set in stone with e.g. one of these newfangled QUIPs.
>
> Pelagicore (via Gordan) kindly contributed a pat
I'd like to establish some kind of convention for naming path/directory-related
environment variables in Qt, with the hope that it could be set in stone with
e.g. one of these newfangled QUIPs.
Pelagicore (via Gordan) kindly contributed a patch to Qt Virtual Keyboard,
where they introduced a QT
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:38:41PM +, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>> Lately it has been quite hard to get change files done for the releases.
and Ossi replied:
> oh, it's that time of the year again. :D
Speaking of which, it's also hard to get API reviews done, even though
they are now much easier (
On 10/11/16 14:21, "Development on behalf of Jędrzej Nowacki"
wrote:
On torsdag 10. november 2016 12.29.12 CET Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> the easiest would be going with the normal approval rights, but limit
> the submit button to a "QUIP owners" group which would consist of lars
On 11/11/2016 05:02 PM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> If QStyle is used by QWidgets, which have been used in apps since well
> before QML existed, it's reasonable to expect that its performance is
> more than acceptable for modern desktop machines.
Not necessarily. This isn't about native QStyle pai
On 10/11/2016 11:55, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> The last gap are Linux styles. The situation with KDE is actually quite
> interesting, since the platform is QStyle based. We do not believe in QStyle
> based styles for QQC2 as it stands. They will never have the same performance
> level of the ot
