Sean Harmer wrote:
> Yeah, trouble with that approach is we are always chasing feature
> support and we'd rather focus efforts elsewhere.
And just running Blender's Python FBX converter
(https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Extensions:2.6/Py/Scripts/Import-Export/Autodesk_FBX)
as is and then working
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Morten Sorvig wrote:
>
> > On 4 Nov 2016, at 09:53, Robert Iakobashvili
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Morten Sorvig
> wrote:
> >>> People cannot dictate to Qt-software at Mac as filed:
> >>> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56811
> >>
> >>
> On 3 Nov 2016, at 17:15, Aleix Pol wrote:
>
> There's also this approach in QtSpeech, is it a dead end?
> https://github.com/qt/qtspeech/tree/wip/speech-recognition
To me this looks like something solution 1) could build on.
Morten
___
Developmen
> On 4 Nov 2016, at 09:53, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Morten Sorvig wrote:
>>> People cannot dictate to Qt-software at Mac as filed:
>>> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56811
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see two possible ways to solve this:
>>
>> 1) Add cross-p
Good to see that discussion arose from this.
> In your email you wrote that blacklisted is just a burden for CI. In
>general it is true, but mark that currently they are compiling and they are
>_not_ crashing. So they do contribute to the quality of Qt.
I didn't think it that way. It's true wh
On 11/04/2016 09:10 AM, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> In your email you wrote that blacklisted is just a burden for CI. In
> general it is true, but mark that currently they are compiling and they are
> _not_ crashing. So they do contribute to the quality of Qt. On the other hand
> they artificia
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Morten Sorvig wrote:
>> People cannot dictate to Qt-software at Mac as filed:
>> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56811
>
> Hi,
>
> I see two possible ways to solve this:
>
> 1) Add cross-platform speech-to-text capabilities to Qt’s text input classes.
> This w
Jędrzej Nowacki contributed:
> Even more, we need something that would not allow flaky, badly written
> test to be merged to Qt in the first place, otherwise we would have
> that discussion again in next 12 months.
How practical would it be to coax CI/Gerrit into recognising when a
commit adds new
Sorry for spamming, the title was wrong. Of course it is Qt 5.8.0 beta...
br,
Jani
From: Jani Heikkinen
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 10:12 AM
To: annou...@qt-project.org
Subject: Qt 5.7.0 beta released
Hi all,
Qt 5.8.0 beta is finally released, see
ht
Hi all,
Qt 5.8.0 beta is finally released, see
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/11/04/qt-5-8-beta-released/
Big thanks for everyone involved!
br,
Jani Heikkinen
Release Manager
The Qt Company
Elektroniikkatie 13
90590 Oulu Finland
jani.heikki...@qt.io
+358 50 4873735
http://qt.io
_
On torsdag 3. november 2016 09.17.57 CET Milla Pohjanheimo wrote:
> I would like to challenge you a bit about removal of (some of) the
> blacklisted autotests.
> (...)
Hi,
In your email you wrote that blacklisted is just a burden for CI. In
general it is true, but mark that currently they
11 matches
Mail list logo
